Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Elecraft\s+K3\s+vs\s+Orion\s+a\s+bit\s+premature\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion a bit premature? (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 11:58:22 -0700
Isn't it a bit premature to be making comparisons with radios that aren't even for sale yet? The K3, the Bretlinger (that got a fold-out ad in QST, despite it doesn't have FCC approval yet), the SDR
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00024.html (10,784 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion a bit premature? (score: 1)
Author: Scott Harwood <scotthsr@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 16:32:22 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
Good comment. Also, if you check the price of the K3 "optional" stuff and compare to what comes with the OII, it isn't half the price of the OII. I compared to what I have in my OII and the K3 came i
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00029.html (10,702 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion a bit premature? (score: 1)
Author: "Dave W7DPW" <w7dpw@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 13:34:44 -0700
I agree with the pricing when both rcvrs have the filters. Dave W7DPW and compare to what comes with the OII, it isn't half the price of the OII. I compared to what I have in my OII and the K3 came i
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00031.html (11,253 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion a bit premature? (score: 1)
Author: Richard Beerman <rbeersr@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 19:46:49 -0500
Ron.... from the prospective of these dinky American radio companies (Flex and Elecraft) , why would they lie and put out bad info? We all know that both these companies are credible with their produ
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00062.html (12,708 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion a bit premature? (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 22:22:55 +0000
Farming out work is not always a good thing (for reasons that have nothing to do with ham radio) depending on the circumstances. If a small shop has some piecemeal work or highly specialized work tha
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00074.html (10,026 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion a bit premature? (score: 1)
Author: "James Duffer" <dufferjames@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 17:45:10 -0500
However, it becomes a problem when a business farms out work to get out of establishing a full-time job and paying benefits and medical insurance. There are a lot of people these days who are "emplo
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00076.html (11,134 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion a bit premature? (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@tx.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 17:51:02 -0500
No. Want to by 10 of something? It is not fun scanning every one, one by one, and then getting yelled at by the machine that you have either NOT put your item in the checkout area, or have put TOO M
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00079.html (8,729 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion a bit premature? (score: 1)
Author: "Barry N1EU" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 07:26:27 -0400
Yes, this IS premature. But I think we CAN say that on paper, the K3 offers more performance than any other radio in the marketplace at the $3000 point and this will hopefully have a more widespread
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00089.html (9,391 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion a bit premature? (score: 1)
Author: "Craig ..." <vk3he@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 05:52:00 -0700 (PDT)
Premature it may be, however not one manufacturer has addressed all of the issues of transceiver design in balanced wholesome fashion. While there has been a tremendous focus on receiver performance
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00091.html (11,513 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu