Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Elecraft\s+K3\s+vs\s+Orion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Elecraft\s+K3\s+vs\s+Orion\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion (score: 1): Author: Eric Rosenberg <wd3q@starpower.net>; Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:42:52 -0400 (EDT); Who does the work is irrelevant. In today's world the vast majority work from electronics to computers to construction, requiring specialized knowledge, training and tools is outsourced (do you have; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00034.html (9,693 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion (score: 1): Author: "M. Todd Miskel" <kt0dd@bresnan.net>; Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 07:45:02 -0600; Hello all, just added up the cost of all features of the K3 to match what I already have in my O2...Came out to $3500! So I see the marketing hype of comparing the K3 to $4000 radios is alive and wel; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00093.html (7,600 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion (score: 1): Author: "Rick, NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 08:59:17 -0500; I don't think I will like the display on the K3. It seems to be the same as the K2 and I never cared for it much, except that its current drain was low (which was great). I don't think this is just m; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00094.html (7,712 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion (score: 1): Author: K4IA@aol.com; Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 10:57:48 EDT; I don't know where all these cost numbers come from. Here is the Order Form. _http://www.elecraft.com/K3/K3%20Order%20form%20rev%204.pdf_ (http://www.elecraft.com/K3/K3%20Order%20form%20rev%204.pdf); /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00095.html (8,252 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion (score: 1): Author: "ken" <barbiekenw@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 11:14:47 -0500; I will wait for the product reviews in QST. Ken K5WK _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00096.html (7,176 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion (score: 1): Author: "ken brookner" <kenb@brookner.com>; Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 10:55:26 -0700; this is pretty interesting.. I like my O1, mostly, but all of my tentec gear has had to make multiple trips back to tentec for repair. that coupled with the poor firmware support makes me very intere; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00098.html (7,598 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@tx.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 13:30:46 -0500; Well, sure. But let's make it a fair comparison and get close to apples to apples. If you don't want or need what comes in an Orion, you can certainly not buy it if you buy a K3. K3, sub-receiver, 1; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00099.html (8,852 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion (score: 1): Author: Kevin Purcell <kevinpurcell@pobox.com>; Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 11:34:43 -0700; This is rather odd. The K2 and K3 displays are rather different. The K2 display was/is a simple 7 segment LCDs with a handful of slightly cheesey chevrons for indicating features along with a couple; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00101.html (10,119 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion (score: 1): Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>; Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 21:52:53 -0400; Rick also makes a great point - the display. My taste is for a huge, 25 inch computer monitor to be my display. Run of course by my computer, which is controlling the Rig. This was nice back when I h; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00122.html (9,728 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion (score: 1): Author: "Roy" <royanjoy@ncn.net>; Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 08:08:18 -0500; I have noticed many K2's drift an objectionable amount. Some have poor keying. Just yesterday I worked a 2-day old K2/100 on 40m cw, and in that 30 minute rag chew it drifted downward 150 Hz. Hope t; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00123.html (8,095 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion (score: 1): Author: Kevin Anderson <k9iua@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 10:44:23 -0700 (PDT); I'm sure you realize that the K2 is a kit, and therefore the actual stability and consistently between radios may vary. The K3 on the other hand will have its boards factory built, which should lead; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00126.html (8,758 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion (score: 1): Author: K4IA@aol.com; Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 14:13:30 EDT; My K2 does not drift at all. k4ia Craig "Buck" Fredericksburg, Virginia USA ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contes; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00127.html (7,889 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion (score: 1): Author: Martin AA6E <aa6e@ewing.homedns.org>; Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 15:26:05 -0400; The K2 spec says < 100 Hz drift from cold start, if anyone is interested. That's not a very tight spec, but I guess Buck's 0 Hz is in tolerance. ;-) 73 Martin AA6E ___________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00128.html (8,656 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion (score: 1): Author: "RM" <royalct@inr.net>; Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 09:01:06 -0400; Wooooooooooo, Patent that No Drift Design; it's the first to exist Ron/NU1U My K2 does not drift at all. k4ia Craig "Buck" Fredericksburg, Virginia USA ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. _____; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00132.html (9,118 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion (score: 1): Author: "Ken" <ka0w@spamcop.net>; Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 08:25:39 -0500; My TR4CW never drifts neither. Stays right with WWV, always other station that I have to chase. 73, KA0W _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00133.html (9,939 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion (score: 1): Author: "Mike Short" <mike.short@mchsi.com>; Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 14:13:24 -0500; Since the K2 is a kit, it is only as good as the assembly and adjustments made by the builder. Mine is very stable, but I took my time, and adjusted everything using a spectrum analyzer. The keying i; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00140.html (9,656 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion (score: 1): Author: "Mike Short" <mike.short@mchsi.com>; Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 17:17:08 -0500; You are not necessarily making a complete comparison. The sub receiver in the OII is a sub, not As capable receiver as the main. The K3 sub receiver should be called a co-receiver, since it is identi; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00141.html (9,759 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion (score: 1): Author: K4IA@aol.com; Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 17:24:16 EDT; Perhaps I should correct myself. . . My K2 drifts no more than my Orion. k4ia Craig "Buck" Fredericksburg, Virginia USA ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. _____________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00143.html (7,903 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@tx.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 17:29:46 -0500; That is true, but it is still an extra cost option, which was the point, I think. Grant/NQ5T _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.co; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00148.html (8,912 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion (score: 1): Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>; Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 00:22:57 -0400; I once had a meter that drifted in exact step with the signal it was measuring, leading me to believe I had a no drift system. Other than that mistake, I've never seen one either. Maybe we can amend; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00153.html (9,959 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]