Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Elecraft\s+K2\s+vs\.\s+Ten\-\s+Tec\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Elecraft\s+K2\s+vs\.\s+Ten\-\s+Tec\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Elecraft K2 vs. Ten- Tec (score: 1): Author: SEWATKINS@dgs.state.va.us (Sherrill WATKINS); Date: Wed, 03 May 2000 09:20:13 -0400; Question: What would be the closest product that Ten Tec offers that would be similar to the Elecraft K2 transceiver? Would it be the Scout?? Thank's- Sherrill W. k4own -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.cont; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-05/msg00067.html (7,431 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Elecraft K2 vs. Ten- Tec (score: 1): Author: jmlowman@ix.netcom.com (Jim Lowman); Date: Wed, 03 May 2000 16:54:34 -0700; In size, maybe, the Scout would be comparable. As far as features, I'd rate the K2 as a small Omni VI Plus. I have an Argo 556, which is a Scout without the 50w amplifier. Unfortunately, T-T disconti; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-05/msg00083.html (7,964 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Elecraft K2 vs. Ten- Tec (score: 1): Author: ac5aa@juno.com (ac5aa@juno.com); Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 21:07:19 -0500; Maybe in raw receiver performance the K2 approaches the VI or VI+ (and kudo's to them for that). But does the K2 do FSK? How about FM (not that the VI's is that great)? Fast/Slow QSK including switch; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-05/msg00089.html (9,409 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Elecraft K2 vs. Ten- Tec (score: 1): Author: ke5c@vvm.com (John, KE5C); Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 22:04:50 -0500; I own a 6+, and I've operated a K2, and I agree with Jim. The K2 is much closer to an Omni than it is to a scout. I've thought really hard about building one, but I'm going to wait for their 50 W ou; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-05/msg00090.html (8,192 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Elecraft K2 vs. Ten- Tec (score: 1): Author: drasmussen@eosintl.com (Don Rasmussen); Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 11:31:17 -0700; Hi Guys, My original reason for trying the OMNI 6+ (I later bought one) was partially because I liked my K2 so much. If you like CW and enjoy your OMNI 6+, you *have* to enjoy the K2. 8-) That having; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-05/msg00095.html (8,230 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Elecraft K2 vs. Ten- Tec (score: 1): Author: csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 11:51:49 -0700 (PDT); My recollection of the numbers is that it meets or exceeds the OMNI VI and VI+ in several significant respects. Anyone have the numbers? Stuff like blocking dynamic range ...? (other stuff missing fr; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-05/msg00096.html (8,321 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]