Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Decision\s+Made\/PRO\s+III\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Decision Made/PRO III (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 22:32:43 -0500
Don't do anything hasty about the ICOM PRO III until you hear from my experience, which isn't quiet complete. I bought one from AES and ran some Spectrogram patterns on the receiver. Mine has serious
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg01016.html (10,537 bytes)

2. RE: [TenTec] Decision Made/PRO III (score: 1)
Author: "WF2U" <wf2u@starband.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 22:56:25 -0500
That's exactly why I got rid of the IC-756 a few weeks ago in favor of the Omni IV. I never suffered operator fatigue from any old rig as much as from the IC-756 which was my newest radio. I checked
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg01019.html (12,158 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Decision Made/PRO III (score: 1)
Author: JS <john.seney@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 06:35:14 -0500
Don't do anything hasty about the ICOM PRO III until you hear from my experience, which isn't quiet complete. I bought one from AES and ran some Spectrogram patterns on the receiver. Mine has serious
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg01094.html (11,189 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Decision Made/PRO III (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 11:21:00 -0500
John: I don't think there is any problem with the PRO III's attenuation of products outside the passband. The problem seems to be the DSP producing products of it's own outside the audio passband. I
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg01101.html (12,656 bytes)

5. RE: [TenTec] Decision Made/PRO III (score: 1)
Author: "Paul - W8KC" <w8kc@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 22:46:26 -0500
Steve, For the benefit of dimwits like me, please explain the "signal" waveform at the top or your chart. I do not understand it that waveform at all. Both waveforms differ greatly and the Pro III se
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg01139.html (8,567 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Decision Made/PRO III (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 05:45:48 -0500
Paul The top waveform is the same thing you would see if you just hooked a scope to your speaker. It shows amplitude vs. time. The bottom display shows frequency vs. time. This is more revealing than
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg01147.html (9,749 bytes)

7. RE: [TenTec] Decision Made/PRO III (score: 1)
Author: "Paul - W8KC" <w8kc@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 07:03:13 -0500
That makes sense... for some reason I thought the top trace was the RF input to the rig, not the audio output! 73 =p= W8KC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@c
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg01165.html (8,762 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu