Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+DSP\s+Filter\s+BW\s+$1\.366\s+vs\s+previous$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+DSP\s+Filter\s+BW\s+$1\.366\s+vs\s+previous$\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] DSP Filter BW (1.366 vs previous) (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 17:02:02 -0500; Mark Erbaugh wrote: For those of you who have upgraded, does this feature allow you to sharpen the filters beyond what was in previous releases or were previous releases hard coded with 199 taps? N4P; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00335.html (8,303 bytes)
2. [TenTec] DSP Filter BW (1.366 vs previous) (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 18:13:48 -0500; Hmmm...in trying this with the 100-110 Hz DSP filters, I noticed a rather drastic gain change (-18 dB) as I adjusted taps from max to min (199 to 32). There is a very noticeable +6 dB jump from 104 t; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00340.html (7,659 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] DSP Filter BW (1.366 vs previous) (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 23:44:49 -0000; I just did some preliminary measurements and it looks like with 199 taps selected, the filters are identical to what they were before. So it appears we always had 199 taps and now we can soften or wi; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00342.html (9,848 bytes)
4. RE: [TenTec] DSP Filter BW (1.366 vs previous) (score: 1): Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 19:14:55 -0500; Carl: Do you think they will do anything with the computer interface so your program will work faster in some areas that are slow or jerky? John N1JM I just did some preliminary measurements and it l; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00347.html (10,909 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] DSP Filter BW (1.366 vs previous) (score: 1): Author: "Larry Rockfield" <w6ub@nxs.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 19:51:50 -0500; Yes, but 100 Hz DSP is much smoother and now pleasant to use with the tap at 150-160, especially if the 250 Hz roofing filter is engaged. Larry W6UB _______________________________________________ Te; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00350.html (8,671 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]