Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Corsairs\,\s+Pro\s+II\,\s+etc\s+hi\s+hi\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Corsairs\,\s+Pro\s+II\,\s+etc\s+hi\s+hi\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Corsairs, Pro II, etc hi hi (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (Barry N1EU); Date: Sat Feb 1 06:57:22 2003; Whatever, but the Corsair sounds so much cleaner than the other rigs, like it's missing an extra layer of grundge ;-) It has its warts, but it's my favorite rig to listen to in long rag chewing sessi; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00000.html (6,208 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Corsairs, Pro II, etc hi hi (score: 1): Author: Wa4aos@aol.com (Wa4aos@aol.com); Date: Fri Jan 31 17:05:49 2003; Hi, Have you been to Robert Sherwood's web page? He has a good selection of 70's through early 90's gear with good specifications. Even a few 60's receivers... <A HREF="http://www.sherweng.com/table.; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00748.html (8,386 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Corsairs, Pro II, etc hi hi (score: 1): Author: geraldj@isunet.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer); Date: Fri Jan 31 17:43:11 2003; I'm not convinced the receivers ten years from now will have better performance. I fear that they will have greater versatility at the cost of poorer performance. Many steps supposedly forward in the; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00750.html (8,573 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Corsairs, Pro II, etc hi hi (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Fri Jan 31 18:07:15 2003; I have looked at it in the past, I have now just looked at it again and it has grown considerably. What is still missing though is data from the various Halicrafters, Mammarlunds, Swans, etc. Let's h; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00752.html (9,351 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Corsairs, Pro II, etc hi hi (score: 1): Author: jmerrill1@adelphia.net (John L Merrill); Date: Fri Jan 31 18:36:46 2003; I'll probably get flamed on this, but in my opinion, if you look at all of the QST reviews, the top 3 receivers are in this order FT-1000, TS-850 and IC-765. The CorsairII doesnt come close. John I h; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00753.html (10,320 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Corsairs, Pro II, etc hi hi (score: 1): Author: w8kc@comcast.net (Paul Valko); Date: Fri Jan 31 19:12:41 2003; John, No flame here, I have not read as in depth as you have so please bear with me, but what made those three rigs "top" in the QST reviews? Which criteria did the Corsair II not even come close to?; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00754.html (8,180 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Corsairs, Pro II, etc hi hi (score: 1): Author: jmerrill1@adelphia.net (John L Merrill); Date: Fri Jan 31 19:20:49 2003; I base my opinion on ARRL testing methods at 20khz spacing for 2 tone 3rd order dynamic range, blocking and 3rd order intercept pt and no other criterea for cw or ssb. 5 khz spacing is another thing; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00755.html (7,816 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Corsairs, Pro II, etc hi hi (score: 1): Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Fri Jan 31 19:25:29 2003; No flames, I'm just wondering in what respects does the Corsair not come close? -Lee WA3FIY; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00756.html (7,837 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Corsairs, Pro II, etc hi hi (score: 1): Author: w8kc@comcast.net (Paul Valko); Date: Fri Jan 31 19:31:14 2003; done Ok. I'd also like to see the 5Khz tests on the Icom/Kenwood/Yaesu. What I think you are pointing out is the same thing Ten*Tec mentions all the time. Nobody in "contest/DX" conditions is as conc; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00757.html (8,748 bytes)
10. [TenTec] Corsairs, Pro II, etc hi hi (score: 1): Author: AC5E@aol.com (AC5E@aol.com); Date: Fri Jan 31 19:32:26 2003; Well, I have never used a paper radio - but I have owned one each of the three radios the ARRL labs supposedly ranked so highly. Whatever their ranking on paper, I chose to dispose of mine rather qui; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00758.html (7,719 bytes)
11. [TenTec] Corsairs, Pro II, etc hi hi (score: 1): Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Fri Jan 31 20:55:52 2003; As you point out Paul, two very important specs are Phase Noise and close in Dynamic Range. There are some interesting numbers regarding the CorsairII and some of the other rigs mentioned. Unfortunat; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00760.html (9,689 bytes)
12. [TenTec] Corsairs, Pro II, etc hi hi (score: 1): Author: "WOTHERSPOON Peter -TSDC" <peter.wotherspoon@torsdc.ca>; Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 14:10:22 -0400; Hope ur still there... I 've been looking for a Corsair or Corsair II. I was wondering if the original C is "better" than the C II ? Any thoungts/comments are greatly appreciated I like the rig cuz i; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00098.html (7,398 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Corsairs, Pro II, etc hi hi (score: 1): Author: "Paul - W8KC" <w8kc@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 20:35:28 -0400; The Corsair II is "better" than the Corsair - filter/receiver-wise. It's just not as pretty. 73! =paul= W8KC Collector of Ten*Tecs and other fine plastics. Visit the Virtual Ten*Tec Museum at http://; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00103.html (8,164 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]