Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Corsair\s+vs\.\s+Orion\s+$weak\s+signal$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Corsair\s+vs\.\s+Orion\s+$weak\s+signal$\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Corsair vs. Orion (weak signal) (score: 1): Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 12:41:35 -0700; Recently a large interest in "ANALOG" transceivers has been discussed. It has been stated by some and confirmed by others that the Corsair II had an outstanding ability to pull in weak signals in the; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00006.html (7,267 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Corsair vs. Orion (weak signal) (score: 1): Author: "John L Merrill" <john.merrill@wivb.com>; Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 16:31:06 -0400; Not sure about experience, but go here http://www.sherweng.com/table.html . I think the Corsair(I) and II are pretty close to the same. As one can see it's almost dead even with the OmniVI+. I did no; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00009.html (8,969 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Corsair vs. Orion (weak signal) (score: 1): Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 21:30:05 -0700; Tnx John. I'm familiar with those figures, but several people here have been making some strong claims of hearing stuff on the Corsair which they can't hear on the newer rigs. I'm just trying to get; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00023.html (9,943 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Corsair vs. Orion (weak signal) (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 07:00:24 -0500; While the technical measurements of the various receivers do seem to show certain ones to be better than others, what ever "better" implies, the reports of being able to hear signals on one receiver; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00025.html (9,239 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Corsair vs. Orion (weak signal) (score: 1): Author: "jrhallas@optonline.net" <jrhallas@optonline.net>; Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 09:28:25 -0400; Robert, Your points are well documented and certainly true, however, they apply to the question of copying a weak signal in the presence of noise or interference. The issue with the third order IMD (; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00028.html (10,561 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Corsair vs. Orion (weak signal) (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 10:03:10 -0400; operator to do a much better job of copying the weak signal than a receiver with poor 3OIMD response. Especially so if an IMD birdie happens to zero beat the signal you are trying to copy. The human; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00031.html (7,076 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Corsair vs. Orion (weak signal) (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 21:12:15 -0500; Now wouldn't a IMD birdie that is zero beat produce nothing as far as an audible signal is concerned? The only thing is that an "on frequency" signal might capture the AGC which would reduce the leve; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00043.html (8,300 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]