Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Compare\s+Paragon\/Paragon\s+II\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Compare\s+Paragon\/Paragon\s+II\.\.\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Compare Paragon/Paragon II... (score: 1): Author: JimN0OCT@aol.com (JimN0OCT@aol.com); Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 17:17:38 EDT; Hi Gang, Will eventually be looking to pick up either a Paragon or a Paragon II. What's the difference? Thanks, Jim NØOCT -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: te; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00239.html (6,862 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Compare Paragon/Paragon II... (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington N4LQ); Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 21:31:58 -0400; Lots of things. They listened to all the comments from Paragon owners and did a major redo of an already good rig. Some improvements I've noticed are: 1. Sidetone quaility much cleaner 2. QSK perfect; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00246.html (8,059 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]