Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Boeing\s+and\s+BPL\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Boeing\s+and\s+BPL\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Boeing and BPL (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 16:57:57 +0000; Not sure if the Boeing filing is gg to be much help or not. It can't hurt, but I've noticed the non-ham players (Boeing, Nat. Acad. Sci. et al.) are understandably confining their remarks to their ow; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00120.html (7,638 bytes)
2. RE: [TenTec] Boeing and BPL (score: 1): Author: "Ron Zond" <k3miy@csonline.net>; Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 13:11:27 -0400; Rob and others the probable reason for the complaints going to Office of Eng. and Tech. is that there are no standards for BPL per se. Once the problems caused by BPL can be measured, standards will; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00121.html (7,700 bytes)
3. RE: [TenTec] Boeing and BPL (score: 1): Author: "David Price" <wa4et@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 18:48:13 +0000; YEP,, THATS MY TAKE ON IT, AS I EXPLAINED TO A FRIEND,, THE IEEE IS THE MOST ENCOMPASSING, BUT THE REST IF TAKEN AS A WHOLE, IS ALSO QUIT COMPELLING From: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com> Repl; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00123.html (8,352 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Boeing and BPL (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 18:47:00 -1000; there are no standards for BPL per se. Once the problems caused by BPL can be measured, standards will be estblished, and regulations will be written. I can see it now. There needs to be a clear defi; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00128.html (7,478 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Boeing and BPL (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 08:44:22 -0400; We're already seeing this. Progress Energy, one of the NC utilities tesing BPL, had this to say on interference complaints: "It is PEC's position and interpretation of the FCC's rules with regard to; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00130.html (9,133 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Boeing and BPL (score: 1): Author: "Larry Laflamme" <laflamme@ncia.net>; Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 13:20:24 +0100; It depends on your definition of "is" Sound familiar? Larry, N1SHM definition _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mai; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00131.html (7,627 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]