Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Bav\.\s+Cont\.\s+Club\s+Review\s+of\s+Orion\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Bav. Cont. Club Review of Orion (score: 1)
Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 12:31:57 -0500
A very helpful commentary. I think the reviewer may have used an IC-746 rather than an IC-746PRO in his comparison because he talks about cascaded 2.4 kHz SSB filters, something that is missing from
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00712.html (7,254 bytes)

2. RE: [TenTec] Bav. Cont. Club Review of Orion (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 11:08:52 -0800
Hi John, To quote the Bavarian Contest Club review verbatim: "I used the IC-746 PRO for this comparison test because it has the ability to cascade two crystal filters." "I set up the IC-746 PRO for 2
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00717.html (8,158 bytes)

3. RE: [TenTec] Bav. Cont. Club Review of Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Martin" <royalct@inr.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 10:00:35 -0500
'A True Apples to Apples comparison?' Regardless of the internal configuration of the radios, the apple-to-apple comparison of two different rigs is the result that the operator listening to has to d
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00749.html (9,827 bytes)

4. RE: [TenTec] Bav. Cont. Club Review of Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 16:35:54 +0100
Ron, It would have been great to test against another high-end rig but we didn't have one. We had planned to test against a TS-850 (which is a very good radio) but unfortunately the unit had been bor
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00750.html (10,785 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu