- 1. [TenTec] Bav. Cont. Club Review of Orion (score: 1)
- Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 12:31:57 -0500
- A very helpful commentary. I think the reviewer may have used an IC-746 rather than an IC-746PRO in his comparison because he talks about cascaded 2.4 kHz SSB filters, something that is missing from
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00712.html (7,254 bytes)
- 2. RE: [TenTec] Bav. Cont. Club Review of Orion (score: 1)
- Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 11:08:52 -0800
- Hi John, To quote the Bavarian Contest Club review verbatim: "I used the IC-746 PRO for this comparison test because it has the ability to cascade two crystal filters." "I set up the IC-746 PRO for 2
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00717.html (8,158 bytes)
- 3. RE: [TenTec] Bav. Cont. Club Review of Orion (score: 1)
- Author: "Ron Martin" <royalct@inr.net>
- Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 10:00:35 -0500
- 'A True Apples to Apples comparison?' Regardless of the internal configuration of the radios, the apple-to-apple comparison of two different rigs is the result that the operator listening to has to d
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00749.html (9,827 bytes)
- 4. RE: [TenTec] Bav. Cont. Club Review of Orion (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
- Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 16:35:54 +0100
- Ron, It would have been great to test against another high-end rig but we didn't have one. We had planned to test against a TS-850 (which is a very good radio) but unfortunately the unit had been bor
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00750.html (10,785 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu