Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+BPL\s+\&\s+Bush\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+BPL\s+\&\s+Bush\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] BPL & Bush (score: 1): Author: <k4dlj@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 18:36:48 -0400; Richard, I have never commented here on the TT Group but thought it was about time. Gratefully, I have enjoyed many hours of good reading from all. We all must understand when the Commander and Cheif; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00605.html (8,104 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] BPL & Bush (score: 1): Author: Joe Malloy <jmalloy@stny.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 18:42:24 -0400; Whew! Until I read the last comment above, I thought you were serious! 73, Joe, W2RBA _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00607.html (7,574 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] BPL & Bush (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 17:53:54 -0500; You are correct, FCC has mostly lawyers and not radio engineers anymore. Bush is a MBA, one trained to delegate; I am sure he has no clue about emer. comms. on HF. But, he was in the oil patch back i; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00608.html (7,642 bytes)
4. RE: [TenTec] BPL & Bush (score: 1): Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 19:17:39 -0500; Hi Dave, Thanks for your reply, I agree that for now it is pretty much a done deal. One point I want to say is that trying to focus on the 'technical' issues is the wrong place in this environment. T; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00613.html (9,939 bytes)
5. RE: [TenTec] BPL & Bush (score: 1): Author: "Bill Rowlett" <kc4atu@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 01:16:36 +0000; Richard and all, Yes, BPL is a done deal because it can be and is being put into operation under the present PART 15 RULES. It is these rules that they want to change. It is the rule changes we are f; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00617.html (11,714 bytes)
6. RE: [TenTec] BPL & Bush (score: 1): Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 22:16:01 -0500; Hi Bill, Thanks for your reply, The rule changes is one issue that can cause a long term problem, Yet the increase cost in electricity to 'fund' the BPL is another, We are all banking on the hope tha; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00626.html (13,187 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]