Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+BPL\,\s+Harmful\s+Interference\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+BPL\,\s+Harmful\s+Interference\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] BPL, Harmful Interference (score: 1): Author: "JAMES HANLON" <knjhanlon@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 10:36:29 -0600; Guys, I'd appreciate some help in finding the definition of "harmful interference" per 47 C. F. R. paragraph 15.5(b). I'm working on my letter to the FCC and my congressional representatives. Thanks,; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00055.html (6,593 bytes)
2. RE: [TenTec] BPL, Harmful Interference (score: 1): Author: "George Maier" <George@MaierGroup.com>; Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 16:00:50 -0400; Jim: Here's a link to 47 CFR. Just click on parts 0-19, then on part 15, and finally on 15.5. http://www.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/cfrassemble.cgi?title=200147 You have a choice of PDF or text docs. The; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00059.html (8,166 bytes)
3. [TenTec] BPL, Harmful Interference (score: 1): Author: DJ5IL@aol.com; Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 05:13:02 EDT; interference" Jim, I follow the BPL discussion in your country with great interest. In Europe that dirty technology is called PLC (Power Line Communication) and here in Germany we had to face that t; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00065.html (13,209 bytes)
4. RE: [TenTec] BPL, Harmful Interference (score: 1): Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 13:19:50 -0500; Using International Law may be a very good argument and a possible tool for to convince the FCC. However, To depend on 'international law' is a dangerous prospect, The dependency implies loss of ones; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00072.html (16,062 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] BPL, Harmful Interference (score: 1): Author: "Dennis Baumgarte" <dbaumgarte@hvc.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 19:18:03 -0400; Rich: The U.S. would not do this for it would not only cause disaster in the radio law but would set a presedent that the US for business gain woud frogo international law.. Dennis AE2EE for legal se; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00077.html (18,720 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] BPL, Harmful Interference (score: 1): Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 22:08:09 -0500; Hi Dennis, Thank you for your reply, True about the disaster for radio, and yes, reguarding this treaty, the US would probably not back away from it even others already have. however it is also true; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00082.html (19,979 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]