Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Attn\s+vs\s+RF\s+Gain\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Attn\s+vs\s+RF\s+Gain\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Attn vs RF Gain (score: 1): Author: <jcharley@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 15:06:40 -0400; Gentlemen and Ladies. Maybe a silly question but ... Is there an actual difference in results if I reduce RF gain or use the attenuator on my Corsair II. In researching the topic on the reflector I s; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00071.html (7,262 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Attn vs RF Gain (score: 1): Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>; Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 15:45:47 -0400; Crit, It depends on the level. As I remember from my Corsair days, the attenuator is between the antenna and RF amplifier. If the RF amplifier input is being overdriven, it will still be if the gain; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00074.html (8,199 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Attn vs RF Gain (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>; Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 14:10:35 -0500; The Attenuator switch in the Corsair II is a misnomer. Its not an attenuator. It literally switches the RF stage out of the circuit and connects the input bandpass filters directly to the mixer. By r; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00082.html (9,487 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]