Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Argo\s+V\s+\#516\s+vs\.\s+Omni\s+6\+\s+\#564\s+RX\s+performance\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Argo\s+V\s+\#516\s+vs\.\s+Omni\s+6\+\s+\#564\s+RX\s+performance\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Argo V #516 vs. Omni 6+ #564 RX performance (score: 1): Author: Barbara Maloney <ac5p@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 09:39:58 -0800 (PST); Is there anyone out there owning both rigs that could give me a users comparison of the DSP and receive filter performance? 73, Mike, AC5P _______________________________________________ TenTec maili; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01293.html (6,851 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Argo V #516 vs. Omni 6+ #564 RX performance (score: 1): Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 13:25:50 -0500; Hello Mike, I have both rigs and here are my observations. DSP: Argonaut 516 - Does not have automatic notch filter, or any notch filter for that matter. That I miss. The noise reduction works well.; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01296.html (8,593 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]