Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Another\s+Possible\s+O\-II\s+Issue\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Another\s+Possible\s+O\-II\s+Issue\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Another Possible O-II Issue (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 21:59:11 -0600; I observed something pretty significant tonight while doing some comparisons between the Main and Sub receivers. I hadn't used the Sub on anything but AM since the II arrived. It's 2.030, resets done; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01154.html (8,335 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Another Possible O-II Issue (score: 1): Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 20:29:15 -0800; Grant: I just checked mine and it appears to do the same thing. Setting up the Main at LSB, BW=1800, PBT=0, and the same thing on the Sub, there is a very noticeable difference. Tweaking the Sub PBT; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01158.html (9,743 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Another Possible O-II Issue (score: 1): Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 04:52:33 -0800 (PST); I'll check that out. Along the same lines though I notice my two recievers dont' sound about the same. My main sound bassey and my sub sounds tinny. Anyone elese? John NA9U __________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01164.html (9,417 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Another Possible O-II Issue (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 08:05:44 -0500; The sub sounds tinny because of the PBT differences. This has always been the case, even with the Orion I. There is a difference on how the filters are set in the passband with the sub-receiver. You; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01165.html (10,968 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Another Possible O-II Issue (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 09:51:36 -0600; The low end on the sub-receiver isn't behaving like it's simply fixed in a different position. It appears to shift even higher as the bandwidth is narrowed. At 3 Khz BW it takes around 50 Hz PBT shi; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01168.html (7,985 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Another Possible O-II Issue (score: 1): Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 08:14:08 -0800; Carl: Does the 200 Hz on the Main RX apply to all bandwidths and modes? Ron N6AHA _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01170.html (8,147 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Another Possible O-II Issue (score: 1): Author: John Nason <jmnason@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 08:49:04 -0800 (PST); I have reproduced Grant's observation as well. I am a bit tone deaf so these things are harder for me to recognize (maybe that is good). But because of that it does not bother me that much. Let's see; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01180.html (9,322 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]