Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Another\s+O2\s+Bug\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Another\s+O2\s+Bug\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Another O2 Bug? (score: 1): Author: "Ken Waites" <BARBIEKENW@peoplepc.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 11:38:06 -0600; That sounds a bit like RF. I wonder what power supply you are using, and whether you are very near a vertical antenna. Not that I am any kind of expert, but reading past archives etc. leads me to thi; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00157.html (6,589 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Another O2 Bug? (score: 1): Author: W4ABW@aol.com; Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 13:00:28 EST; I see on eham that OII has three good reviews. Hopefully more to follow ! But, not to worry boys and girls, OIII could come to the rescue in a few years, HI ! All the best for the new year, Al W4ABW; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00158.html (6,998 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Another O2 Bug? (score: 1): Author: "Glassrus" <glassrus@houston.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 12:49:20 -0600; I see on eham that OII has three good reviews. Hopefully more to follow ! But, not to worry boys and girls, OIII could come to the rescue in a few years, HI ! Or a few months, whichever comes first.; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00159.html (7,365 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Another O2 Bug? (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 15:25:29 EST; Correction, We only invested $1,100.00 total upgrade cost to get the O2. $3,600 (with AT) - $2500 trade = $1,100 73, Lee _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@con; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00164.html (7,045 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Another O2 Bug? (score: 1): Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 21:01:51 +0000; Huh? Isn't the O2 (with AT) $4300, not $3600? _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00167.html (7,677 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Another O2 Bug? (score: 1): Author: "ROBERT CARROLL" <w2wg@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 16:24:31 -0500; Of course if you want the filters, you have to buy new ones. They are expensive, but in my experience worth every $$ if you want to take advantage of the set's capabilities. Bob W2WG Correction, We o; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00168.html (8,186 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Another O2 Bug? (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 18:59:57 EST; Yep, Orion was $3,600 with AT (not O2) O2 is $3,995 WITHOUT AT Trade in is $2500 with AT What I was saying is it only cost me $1,100 to use the Orion for 2 years, and now can get the O2. Sorry for th; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00177.html (7,658 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Another O2 Bug? (score: 1): Author: RaySoifer@cs.com; Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 13:31:39 EST; At first I thought so too, but it also happens when I am just receiving. There are no significant RF sources nearby. 73, Ray W2RS _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list T; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00186.html (7,911 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]