Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Active\s+noise\s+cancelling\.\s+Was\s+\"Re\:\s+Scads\s+of\s+used\s+Icom\s+IC\-7300\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Active\s+noise\s+cancelling\.\s+Was\s+\"Re\:\s+Scads\s+of\s+used\s+Icom\s+IC\-7300\"\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Active noise cancelling. Was "Re: Scads of used Icom IC-7300" (score: 1): Author: Katz Ajamas <ajamas.rn@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:59:14 -0400; I can not use the MFJ on 160 without a trap on the main antenna because of strong local stations causing all manner of intermod. The solution will be two antennas for RX phasing. Two of the others ca; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00241.html (8,415 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Active noise cancelling. Was "Re: Scads of used Icom IC-7300" (score: 1): Author: Katz Ajamas <ajamas.rn@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 15:04:26 -0400; Another that appears as if it will handle strong local signals a bit better: http://dl2kq.de/ant/3-15d.htm 73, -Bob ah7i _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@con; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00242.html (7,332 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Active noise cancelling. Was "Re: Scads of used Icom IC-7300" (score: 1): Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 22:34:38 +0200; I wouldn't hold my breath on that $600 model being any better than the others. Products from that source tend to cost a bit more. I didn't quite understand you problem description and antenna setup.; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00243.html (9,734 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]