Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ARRL\s+Phase\s+Noise\s+Data\s+Plotted\s+to\s+1\s+MHz\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] ARRL Phase Noise Data Plotted to 1 MHz (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 13:45:04 -0700
The title says it all -- Rick asked for it, and I did it this morning, changing the frequency axis to log and moving labels around. I also added data for the new IC7100, a do everything cheapie with
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00765.html (7,654 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Phase Noise Data Plotted to 1 MHz (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 16:32:36 -0500
Nicely done, Jim. Since I have an O II, I looked at that one first. I see the O II shows the lowest phase noise out to about 2.5 kHz, where it matched the K3, then heads the wrong way. It's #2 to abo
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00768.html (10,871 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Phase Noise Data Plotted to 1 MHz (score: 1)
Author: Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 23:01:57 +0000 (GMT+00:00)
Great summary Kim, and yes that data on the Orion II is disappointing too. I wonder if there is anything that can be done to resolve it only via firmware changes? I simply don't know. Jim, Thank You
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00780.html (12,185 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Phase Noise Data Plotted to 1 MHz (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 16:58:18 -0700
Good question, Kim. Part of the answer is the RX bandwidth. Another part is the receiver's issues. In the meantime, here's more to chew on. It includes replots of ARRL's Keying spectra, and some word
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00789.html (8,034 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Phase Noise Data Plotted to 1 MHz (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 22:27:36 -0700
Off list. I've been thinking about this. First, I think it's non-correlated noise, so the wideband noise would add by 10 log BW, where BW is the RX bandwidth that would need a correction factor for f
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00803.html (10,789 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Phase Noise Data Plotted to 1 MHz (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 09:23:07 -0700
Well, I meant to send it off list, but it was late. :) I've been thinking about this. Overnight, I thought some more. The keying waveform is, fundamentally, modulation of a continuous carrier by a wa
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00832.html (10,144 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Phase Noise Data Plotted to 1 MHz (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 11:36:03 -0500
I've been thinking, too. A square wave has an infinite number I'd odd harmonics, not all harmonics. Regardless, it's an excellent way to look at IMD, far better than two tones. What if we modulated t
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00835.html (11,086 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Phase Noise Data Plotted to 1 MHz (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 09:56:24 -0700
Yup. What if we modulated the TX with pink noise? That really does have everything in it. Make the pink noise much wider than the expected audio bandwidth. Ideally, the spectrum should be limited to
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00838.html (10,613 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Phase Noise Data Plotted to 1 MHz (score: 1)
Author: Robert <rmcgraw@blomand.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 12:10:14 -0500
I use pink noise for all my tests that involve a signal like speech. I agree Jim that it is the proper signal character for the mode. 73 Bob, K4TAX Sent from my iPhone _______________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00839.html (11,398 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu