For anyone interested, the ARRL review (to be published in the August issue) is not posted on the members website. I haven't had time to read the whole thing yet, but took just a cursory look at some
that "not" in the first sentence should be "now" ... doggone typos .. :-( _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman
What about firmware problems? :-) John N1JM For anyone interested, the ARRL review (to be published in the August issue) is not posted on the members website. I haven't had time to read the whole thi
How many times did they have to do a master reset? So I guess if you are going to be operating in a fairly busy contest, the 7800 is the way to go? B-) B-) B-) 73 Billy AA4NU _______________________
At least if the contest is on an empty band. Have at it! 73, Duane On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 11:10:19 -0500 "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com> writes: -- Duane Calvin, AC5AA Austin, Texas http://home.austin
probably none. How many times did they have to do a master reset? 73 Billy AA4NU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/
I personally hope that the IC-7800 performs well for its intended use and audience. The only thing that bothers me, is what Icom did to the IC-756 following. (IC-756, 756Pro and then the 756Proll) Yo
The biggest problem I see is that there may be a rust problem.. the various QST reviewers did a lot of slobbering and drooling all over the thing :-) We've joked around around that, but I really thi
Why don't you suggest that option to them? Nothing says that they can't have a DSP/CPU upgrade from time to time. 73, Bernard, WA4OEJ would have _______________________________________________ TenTec
can't and following. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
As we know, the ARRL likes the advertizing $$ as well. Just ask John Bee, when we told him about the problems with the FT100 he weighed what was worth more when deciding if he should inquire further.
As we know, the ARRL likes the advertizing $$ as well. Just ask John Bee, when we told him about the problems with the FT100 he weighed what was worth more when deciding if he should inquire further.
Sorry Richy. As much as I am upset with the ARRL, in particular K1ZZ, I think your dead wrong. I used to think the very same thing about their equipment reviews verses who advertises with them the mo
As we know, the ARRL likes the advertizing $$ as well. Just ask John Bee, when we told him about the problems with the FT100 he weighed what was worth more when deciding if he should inquire further.
Any advertiser supported publication that prints equipment reviews MUST give due consideration to all aspects of the situation. An editor must consider who they want to lay off before they print a su
Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:34:33 -0500
Uh oh, me thinks their test results are accurate. But I think it is their reporting which is tainted. 73 Bob, K4TAX test in methods was ARRL the happier N2ZD _________________________________________
I wonder how important advertising in QST is to the sales of a ham radio manufacturer? If it's really, really important-- as in the primary means of letting the majority of the amateur radio communit
IMHO the quality of the text article accompanying the ARRL's lab findings in the QST reviews is highly dependent on the author of the text, rather than the result of any editorial bias. For example,
Author: "Harry van Enckevort" <Harry.van.Enckevort@tiscali.nl>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:49:10 +0100
Check out wat hij zegt over de 847 !! --Oorspronkelijk bericht-- Van: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] Namens al_lorona@agilent.com Verzonden: dinsdag 29 juni 2004