Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+A\s+comment\s+on\s+a\s+post\s+on\s+eHam\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] A comment on a post on eHam (score: 1)
Author: "J. D." <duffyb01@fuse.net>
Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 18:15:39 -0400 (Eastern Standard Time)
I saw a post on eHam discussing equipment manufacturers "elling out hams." A comment from one poster said TenTec was in financial trouble. Is this true? My God I hope not. Duffy www.wb8nut.com ______
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00020.html (7,027 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] A comment on a post on eHam (score: 1)
Author: ac5e@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 02 May 2004 22:29:06 +0000
There are always rumors, but since there's such a waiting list for the Orion I expect they are still afloat. One of the surest signs of financial trouble is when a company sharply reduces the selling
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00022.html (7,509 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] A comment on a post on eHam (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 18:06:36 -0500
So, if this were really valid data, don't you think the poster would say where he got his information? Always remember, many posters have no qualms stating what they have no possibility of knowing. W
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00024.html (8,465 bytes)

4. RE: [TenTec] A comment on a post on eHam (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Rowlett" <kc4atu@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 02 May 2004 23:35:46 +0000
And do you believe everything you read in the paper too. Most of what is on eham is just the ramblings of a few misfits, gave up on the site a long time ago. 73, Bill kc4atu From: "J. D." <duffyb01@f
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00026.html (8,612 bytes)

5. RE: [TenTec] A comment on a post on eHam (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Rowlett" <kc4atu@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 02 May 2004 23:36:35 +0000
And do you believe everything you read in the paper too. Most of what is on eham is just the ramblings of a few misfits, gave up on the site a long time ago. 73, Bill kc4atu From: "J. D." <duffyb01@f
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00027.html (8,183 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] A comment on a post on eHam (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 02 May 2004 19:39:16 -0500
If you believe everything you read on eHam, see in a reflector post, or find elsewhere on the internet, I suggest you visit http://www.snopes.com :-) This rumor surfaced several months ago, as "MFJ i
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00030.html (8,860 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] A comment on a post on eHam (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 08:42:10 -0400
Ignore it. There have been people flying this type of garbage as far back as when Ten Tec still had a dealer network. I still remember when one local picked up on & spread the rumor that the Argosy's
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00040.html (8,988 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu