Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+A\s+Look\s+at\s+NR\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+A\s+Look\s+at\s+NR\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] A Look at NR (score: 1): Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>; Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 23:30:27 -0500; Orion I Noise Reduction Testing == Tested with NR settings of 1 and 9, firmware V1.373b5. Testing performed in LSB mode, PBT = 0 Hz, BW = 2500 Hz Steady input consisting of white noise plus a CW sign; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01043.html (8,328 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] A Look at NR (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 23:03:16 -0600; There is no bandpass filtering action on 2.032 with a steady state signal. That's also obvious from the spectrograms. Some high frequency rolloff, and that's it. Is there some reason it would show u; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01045.html (8,469 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] A Look at NR (score: 1): Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>; Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 00:11:01 -0500; I've tested 1.373b5, didn't have time to do it with V2. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/m; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01049.html (8,111 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] A Look at NR (score: 1): Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>; Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 00:12:39 -0500; Not, the job is actually easiest with a steady carrier. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/m; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01050.html (8,118 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] A Look at NR (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 23:55:25 -0600; Wanted to make sure I wan't missing something obvious :-) There's a PDF file here with some samples of what I see on the II. I adjusted the levels so the NR/no-NR curves roughly overlapped, for comp; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01051.html (8,320 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] A Look at NR (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 07:34:55 EST; I have an OII so I can't do the trest here I am suggestiong. Someone with Orion please try this out... Start with Orion V1.371 find a band with some normal noise like 20 right now (during the day) Tu; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01068.html (7,180 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] A Look at NR (score: 1): Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 18:49:54 -0800; At the end of the day, it *is* a subjective test that determines which one is better, and even then, different conditions will yield different results. If possible, the test should be done in conditi; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01074.html (9,057 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] A Look at NR (score: 1): Author: <k6kdk@k6kdk.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 19:13:51 -0800; Ron, No such luck, two different processors, two sets of code Orion I 16-bit fixed-point; OrionII 32-bit floating point -Dan K6KDK was new _______________________________________________ TenTec maili; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01076.html (7,713 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] A Look at NR (score: 1): Author: "Merle Bone" <merlebone@charter.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 22:53:51 -0600; "No such luck, two different processors, two sets of code Orion I 16-bit fixed-point; OrionII 32-bit floating point" Ron (K6KDK), The Noise Reduction code runs in the DSP processors. The two DSP proc; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01081.html (7,436 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] A Look at NR (score: 1): Author: Lin Davis <linbdavis@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 02:04:01 -0500; Wow, some great information has been brought forth here in the last 24 hrs! Thank you, Sinisa and Grant, for taking the time to run those tests and sharing the results with us. They show me that my c; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01086.html (11,251 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] A Look at NR (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 02:59:32 -0600; In many respects I wish I still had mine. I could have handled keeping both of them for a while, but didn't see any reason to hang on to it. Some lucky soul out there probably has it ... Grant/NQ5T; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01087.html (7,492 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] A Look at NR (score: 1): Author: "Bob Cunnings" <bob.cunnings@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 11:44:56 -0700; Well, where it may count the most, the DSP processors have not changed - Orion II uses the SHARC 21065, same as Orion?? (no schematic available for download to check) Bob NW8L _______________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01099.html (8,156 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]