Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+60\s+Meters\s+\!\!\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+60\s+Meters\s+\!\!\!\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] 60 Meters !!! (score: 1): Author: kj4dx@yahoo.com (Mitch Alexander); Date: Sat Feb 22 19:15:42 2003; Hi, Gents -- It's been a long while since I last posted. I've been thinking about 60 meters lately, you know- the new HF band proposed to the FCC by the ARRL, spanning 5250-5400 kHz. I understand tha; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00837.html (8,108 bytes)
2. [TenTec] 60 Meters !!! (score: 1): Author: geraldj@isunet.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer); Date: Sat Feb 22 20:17:38 2003; Since the fundamental PTO range is 5 to 5.5 the odds of adding a controllable 5 MHz output band without excess birdies are essentially zero. Outboard boxes might mix from some higher band but the PTO; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00841.html (8,134 bytes)
3. [TenTec] 60 Meters !!! (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Sat Feb 22 21:15:41 2003; Mitch, Any older radio that uses a 5 - 5.5 MHz VFO will probably need some sort of external transverter to access the proposed 60 meter band. Most of these radios don't have the capability to add an; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00842.html (9,399 bytes)
4. [TenTec] 60 Meters !!! (score: 1): Author: farson@shaw.ca (Adam Farson); Date: Sat Feb 22 22:04:33 2003; Hi Mitch, By the time the NTIA signs off on 60m, the ITU designates it as an amateur band world-wide and the FCC authorises it, at least 10 years will have passed - by which time most of us will have; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00843.html (9,290 bytes)
5. [TenTec] 60 Meters !!! (score: 1): Author: wb8yqj@yahoo.com (Don Rasmussen); Date: Sat Feb 22 23:12:44 2003; We all eagerly and patiently wait for NTIA, ITU, the FCC, and TENTEC for one small segment of new bandspace. Meanwhile parts of our existing bands are nearly impassable with QRM due to the lack of a; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00844.html (8,673 bytes)
6. [TenTec] 60 Meters !!! (score: 1): Author: farson@shaw.ca (Adam Farson); Date: Sat Feb 22 23:37:52 2003; Hi Don, Actually, since Riley Hollingsworth came aboard, the FCC's fairly rigorous enforcement policy has helped clean things up quite a bit on the US ham bands. The big problem is pirate operators,; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00845.html (8,508 bytes)
7. [TenTec] 60 Meters !!! (score: 1): Author: kw0d@netexpress.net (Dave Kamp, KW0D); Date: Sat Feb 22 23:56:57 2003; --Ooh- there's a mighty fine Scottish word fer ye! Hey- rathern' hammer the concept of making these old rigs go there, is there some interesting way which one might experiment? How about using the 5m; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00846.html (8,493 bytes)
8. [TenTec] 60 Meters !!! (score: 1): Author: farson@shaw.ca (Adam Farson); Date: Sun Feb 23 00:01:51 2003; Hi Dave, Neat idea - an I/Q image-reject mixer down-converting to ZIF, and driving a DSP (as in the Collins 95S-1). One needs a spectrum analyser to keep it clean, though. Cheers for now, 73, Adam VA; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00847.html (9,123 bytes)
9. [TenTec] 60 Meters !!! (score: 1): Author: geraldj@isunet.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer); Date: Sun Feb 23 11:07:44 2003; http://www.bright.net/~kanga/kanga/ has KK7B designed kits for the direct conversion transmitters and receivers. The latest R2PRO had a glorious article in QST a few years ago. The kits are available; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00854.html (8,199 bytes)
10. [TenTec] 60 Meters !!! (score: 1): Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (Stuart Rohre); Date: Mon Feb 24 17:51:03 2003; Probably not possible with older IF and mixing schemes. It will take a case by case basis as to whether it would work without excess birdies. 73, Stuart K5KVH; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00901.html (7,647 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]