Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+30\s+day\s+Return\s+Policy\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+30\s+day\s+Return\s+Policy\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] 30 day Return Policy (score: 1): Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:54:35 -0400; Please read this, if you are so inclined, in it's entirety before responding. ** I would be very pleased if you or your friend Tommy would post this response on the TT reflector relating to the delug; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01134.html (10,263 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] 30 day Return Policy (score: 1): Author: "John T. Gwin" <jtgwin@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:48:38 -0500; Please feel free to copy and past it verbatum, and with my name and call sign associated with it. I want people to hear my side of the story straight from the horse's mouth. Thanks for your kind cons; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01135.html (7,141 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] 30 day Return Policy (score: 1): Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:38:18 -0400; No I can't. I also went back through ALL of those Jupiter reviews and could not find Bob's specific call. However, based on experience, it is not unusual for post to sometimes disappear from eHam. Th; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01136.html (9,386 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] 30 day Return Policy (score: 1): Author: Chas Nagel <cnagel@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:39:38 -0700 (PDT); I was unable to find also. Charles, K0CW _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01137.html (8,066 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] 30 day Return Policy (score: 1): Author: "Adam N." <adam2@n4ekv.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:57:15 -0700; From my observations, eHam routinely deletes negative reviews without notice, particularly, it seems, when they concern eHam advertisers (or perhaps when those advertisers complain). A lengthy and in; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01138.html (11,618 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] 30 day Return Policy (score: 1): Author: "John T. Gwin" <jtgwin@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:04:44 -0500; From my observations, eHam routinely deletes negative reviews without notice, particularly, it seems, when they concern eHam advertisers (or perhaps when those advertisers complain). On the other han; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01139.html (8,482 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] 30 day Return Policy (score: 1): Author: W4ABW@aol.com; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:15:41 EDT; My eham comments on my Alpha 89 and the warranty problem I experienced that was posted a few years ago is still there. Al W4ABW Raleigh _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01140.html (7,736 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] 30 day Return Policy (score: 1): Author: "Lew" <ljl160@netzero.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:19:46 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time); After seeing so many comments, is there ever a perfect product of any kind? I doubt it yet we all generally love our favorite rigs, accessories, etc. BTW- so far, I'm very happy to be a Ten Tec user.; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01141.html (8,280 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] 30 day Return Policy (score: 1): Author: Mike Bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:23:04 -0400; Well I can understand TT point of view. Allow me to explain: I manufacture and sell solar electric systems and controls. It's just a hobby for me, but I've been into this stuff since 1978. A few year; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01142.html (10,434 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] 30 day Return Policy (score: 1): Author: "Warren J. Walsh" <warrenw@pentek.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:07:02 -0400; That's because they were not Jupiters, the were Pegasus units! http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/165?page=2 Notice how different this sounds compared to his fowarded letter... 73 Warren Walsh - K2BM; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01144.html (7,691 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] 30 day Return Policy (score: 1): Author: "M. P. Haynes" <k4beh@juno.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:07:49 -0400; re: Ten-Tec return policy. I'd like to speak up on this thread. I bought a new Argonaut V a couple of years ago. After evaluating it for a month I decided that, even though it was a very good transce; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01146.html (13,258 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] 30 day Return Policy (score: 1): Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:33:21 -0400; Well there many not be any 'perfect' products of any kind, but from my point of view for ham radio use, the Omni 6 Plus, the Omni 6, the Omni C , the Corsair 2, and the Icom IC-781 all come about as; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01147.html (8,903 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] 30 day Return Policy (score: 1): Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:46:06 -0700; Tom, you are correct, looking backwards. The problem is none of these rigs are getting any younger. Older rigs often develop problems with switches and rheostats, etc. Also, replacement parts become; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01149.html (11,655 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] 30 day Return Policy (score: 1): Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:49:01 -0500; Bull. I know the Reviews editor personally, and he'd rather leave a negative posting than kill it. If I remember correctly, the only reason he will delete a negative posting is if the reviewer never; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01153.html (13,563 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] 30 day Return Policy (score: 1): Author: "Bill Rowlett" <kc4atu@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:42:39 +0000; They have the right to sell to who they want, been in the retail side of this hobby and there were a few we refused to do buisness with also. kc4atu __________________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01167.html (9,519 bytes)
16. [TenTec] 30 Day Return Policy (score: 1): Author: "Robert Cleve" <bob.cleve@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:46:23 -0400; That's because I mistyped Pegasus into that review instead of typing Jupiter. My error. I caught that error shortly thereafter and sent in a corrected review but it too has mysteriously disappeared a; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01168.html (8,481 bytes)
17. [TenTec] 30 day Return Policy (score: 1): Author: Lee Crocker <w9oy@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:47:12 -0700 (PDT); So based on the fact his eham review describes his experience with a Pegasus, and his sob story here describes his experience with a Jupiter, the guy isn't even sure what radio he bought and returned; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01169.html (8,821 bytes)
18. [TenTec] 30 day return policy (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:36:21 +0000; For the record, there were two eham posts to the Orion reviews column on Sunday July 24th, that gave accounts in which it was claimed that the authors were not sold merchandise because of past proble; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01171.html (12,235 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] 30 day Return Policy (score: 1): Author: "HUGHESRO" <ROGERH@realtracs.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:20:41 -0500; i agree mike. let a ham friend buy him a new orion 2 and lets get over this and move on to TT radios. this and the nprm has gotten to much bandwidth. imho, roger -- Original Message -- From: Mike Bry; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01174.html (12,046 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] 30 day Return Policy (score: 1): Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:33:48 -0400; I, personally do not know if the email from Stan was real. It did not come directly to me. However, here is a copy I was sent today: "<<< I called Stan at Ten Tec this morning just to see if the memo; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01181.html (10,955 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]