Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+217\s+filter\s+with\s+extra\s+loss\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+217\s+filter\s+with\s+extra\s+loss\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] 217 filter with extra loss (score: 1): Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner WA3JPG); Date: Sat, 11 Jul 1998 21:54:20 -0700; If I wasn't clear in my last post, I was comparing two Ten Tec model 217 filters for loss and center frequency and found one to be noticeably lossier than the other. My comments on the INRAD filters; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00108.html (7,277 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]