Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+2\.033\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+2\.033\s*$/: 41 ]

Total 41 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] 2.033 (score: 1): Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 00:04:13 -0600; the raspy audio on the + EQ adjust on TX or RX only occurs through the headphones. The decreased audio seems to be a function of the changes in the rec. EQ. If I adjust the RCV EQ to a pos value, the; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00762.html (6,766 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] 2.033 (score: 1): Author: John Sheeley <wb4qda@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 09:38:06 -0700 (PDT); Doug No raspy audio here on my Orion II . The receive EQ does act kind of like a volume control the + side is louder and - side is decreases the volume. 73 John WB4QDA _______________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00764.html (8,254 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] 2.033 (score: 1): Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:19:48 -0400; John, Here is an explanation of why your RX EQ does not behave as it did in V1 O1, for better of worse in the 2.0 firmware for both orions the RX EQ acts like a volume control. There is a good descri; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00768.html (10,699 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] 2.033 (score: 1): Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:26:57 -0600; Great explanation. and, I'll bet the static and popping I am hearing is the result of my CHEAPER headphones being over driven. So what is recommended on headphones with the Orion II? ________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00772.html (12,019 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] 2.033 (score: 1): Author: Rideout Family <wa6ipd@dslextreme.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:04:59 -0700; Best stereo headphones are........Sony MDR-7506 Art WA6IPD _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tente; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00773.html (12,894 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] 2.033 (score: 1): Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:10:39 -0700 (PDT); I use the Bose TriPort headphones. $150 at Best Buy. Most awesome. The Sony's are FB as well. 73, John NA9U _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com h; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00774.html (7,574 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] 2.033 (score: 1): Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:06:23 -0600; Better headphones, or different anyway, cured the snap and crack in the audio. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/ma; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00779.html (8,452 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] 2.033 (score: 1): Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:11:20 -0600; sope to soon. Still a problem just not near as bad. I am using my heil pro headset now. hummmmm...turned into dits and bit so we will see. _______________________________________________ TenTec maili; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00781.html (8,727 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] 2.033 (score: 1): Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 13:46:26 -0600; I think I like the direction of this release the more I play with it. The NR does still add raspiness to the CW signal but it seems to greatly reduce background noise more so than 2.032. Grant...care; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00079.html (6,578 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] 2.033 (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 16:38:00 -0500; Could just be AGC settings, or the characteristics of today's noise. A quick check at the behavior on a spectrum analyser with a constant carrier signal in the passband doesn't show anything signifi; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00089.html (8,496 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] 2.033 (score: 1): Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 15:45:47 -0600; Thanks for the laugh Grant...I needed that disclaimer. the difference is that the NR seems much more aggressive. And, you may be onto something with the distortion. Disclaimer: No...you can't have my; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00091.html (9,118 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] 2.033 (score: 1): Author: Lin Davis <linbdavis@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 23:40:10 -0400; Hi Grant, etc, What you say about the "distortion" actually being the noise that had been suppressed until the cw element or ssb signal raised the gain is accurate. There is added distortion, though,; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00107.html (10,860 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] 2.033 (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 23:48:45 -0500; It's easily visible in a waterfall display. http://mysite.verizon.net/nq5t/Misc/CWgram.png I've never really figured out if you're right in your conclusion that NR is a downward expander, but the on; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00109.html (8,170 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] 2.033 (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 07:05:21 -0400; NQ5T: adds nothing to (S+N)/N ratio, and at any BW below about 1000 Hz actually degrades it. Just to clarify Orion's implementation of DSP NR, I believe your statement is true for ANY DSP rig with re; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00111.html (7,911 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] 2.033 (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 08:00:48 -0500; If NR were being done by bandwidth reduction, the method I've used to measure it should show some improvement in SNNR, at least above the very narrowest bandwidths where the amount of noise relative; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00114.html (8,739 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] 2.033 (score: 1): Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>; Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 14:54:10 -0400; FWIW.....not ALL DSP just narrows bandwidth. The way it worked when I used to work with audio DSP systems in a previous life (and the IF of the Orion is at an audio frequency) is that each sample of; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00132.html (10,385 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] 2.033 (score: 1): Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 13:08:02 -0600; Gary, you sure the dsp BW filtering is audio? Seems to me that it is in the 3rd if at 14KhZ? Is my thinking wrong? Now if you are talking about NR then I agree with you. And I agree with your expecte; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00134.html (12,317 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] 2.033 (score: 1): Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>; Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 15:17:07 -0400; I just meant that 15 kHz is a frequency in the audio range. I know it is used as an IF frequency in the Orion. The point was that the frequency is very low....low enough that DSP chips can process th; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00135.html (13,662 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] 2.033 (score: 1): Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 13:23:47 -0600; right on Gary...thanks for the insight! _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00136.html (15,122 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] 2.033 (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>; Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 14:45:03 -0500; The first book I read on noise reduction perhaps ten years ago concentrated on the correlation technique and I believe that is often used because it works but it leaves a background that is not very; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00140.html (14,757 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]