Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+\[OT\]\s+reflector\s+date\s+18\s+April\s+2002\?\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+\[OT\]\s+reflector\s+date\s+18\s+April\s+2002\?\?\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] [OT] reflector date 18 April 2002??? (score: 1): Author: khopper@uchicago.edu (Ken Hopper); Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 09:48:06 -0500; I wonder if the reflector date screwed up? the last msg was dated 18 April 2002. Or is it my browser? tnx, de ken n9vv; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00383.html (6,526 bytes)
2. [TenTec] [OT] reflector date 18 April 2002??? (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU); Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 09:37:07 -0700 (PDT); It's neither Ken. It's the pc clock for the person who posted that message. In some cases (not this one), forward dating is a rude trick by the poster to keep their message at the top of a list of m; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00386.html (6,922 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]