Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+\[OT\]\s+re\:\s+50hz\s+PSK\s+filter\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+\[OT\]\s+re\:\s+50hz\s+PSK\s+filter\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] [OT] re: 50hz PSK filter? (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:35:17 -0800 (PST); The ideal goal for these digital modes is to move the actual decoding of these signals directly to the DSP. By doing so you eleiminate the introduction of distortions by the D to A process, a chain a; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00003.html (8,897 bytes)
2. [TenTec] [OT] re: 50hz PSK filter? (score: 1): Author: n9vv@wideopenwest.com (Ken Hopper - Amateur Radio N-9-V-V); Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:02:30 -0600; Dear Mark and the group, I am confused about this. Can you help me out? I thought the strength of PSK (and MFSK) was in the DSP filtering done at 31.5hz by the SOUND CARD and the front end RX didn't; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00603.html (7,577 bytes)
3. [TenTec] [OT] re: 50hz PSK filter? (score: 1): Author: geraldj@isunet.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer); Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:33:22 -0600; It all depends on the dynamic range of the receiver and the DSP. If the strong signals passing through the receiver but rejected by the external DSP cause the receiver gain to drop so low as to loose; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00604.html (7,543 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]