Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fwd\:\s+Re\:\s+The\s+Perfect\s+CW\s+Station\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fwd\:\s+Re\:\s+The\s+Perfect\s+CW\s+Station\]\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Fwd: Re: The Perfect CW Station] (score: 1): Author: wr4i@nando.net (Dennis Terribile); Date: Thu, 18 Apr 96 16:13:12 EDT; Hi TenTec Fans Ran across these comments re. VI and thought they would be of interest to the group>>; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-04/msg00049.html (9,998 bytes)
2. [Fwd: Re: The Perfect CW Station] (score: 1): Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner WA3JPG); Date: Fri, 19 Apr 1996 22:29:18 -0700; This forwarded post was truly overkill, I probably don't need to post about it, but here goes - This is nonsense, and stating such things does not serve the loyal American radio buyer (I am one mysel; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-04/msg00060.html (7,338 bytes)
3. [Fwd: Re: The Perfect CW Station] (score: 1): Author: nu6u@w6trw.ampr.org (nu6u@w6trw.ampr.org); Date: Sat, 20 Apr 96 10:57:56 EDT; Hi Clark, Just a note to let you know that I thought your post pertaining to "Jap" rigs was right on the money. Amateur equipment - like people - should be judged on their merit, and not by ones own; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-04/msg00061.html (6,744 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]