Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wtrone@comcast.net: 114 ]

Total 114 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TenTec] Steppir vs Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 21:17:33 -0500
Stuart: I don't yet know what the problem is? I don't think that the cogs have stripped out, but I'm not sure how to check if it is binding. I'm experiencing the same problem with a second driven ele
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg01058.html (9,297 bytes)

62. Re: [TenTec] New to the list--Orion questions (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 22:05:53 -0500
Hi Don: I have never used an ICOM 756 so I can't comment on its relative operation. My new Orion replaced a Yaesu FT-1000. The FT-1000 with a NIR-12 DSP was a mighty fine rig, but I think that the Or
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg01087.html (11,712 bytes)

63. Re: [TenTec] iCom's approach to the 7800 issues (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 07:06:09 -0500
Clark: I guess it all depends on how you view the comments. Is the glass half full or is it half empty? I really don't find the comments posted on this board to be very heavy criticisms. No, not at a
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00057.html (9,456 bytes)

64. Re: [TenTec] iCom's approach to the 7800 issues (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 07:49:37 -0500
Tommy: I got the 3 Element one. I understand that the really big one will not start shipping until the end of the Summer. I bought the 3 Element with the notion that sometime in the future I would re
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00059.html (8,996 bytes)

65. [TenTec] Orion and SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 08:56:04 -0500
After taking "care" of a few pine trees, I finally have my new 3 element SteppIR antenna up and operational. It sure seems to work well. The antenna patterns seem to be a little sharper than the TH-7
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00309.html (7,937 bytes)

66. Re: [TenTec] Orion and SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:20:43 -0500
Yes, my control box is the new one. I received the antenna the end of May. The control box has the 57,600 baud setting and the Orion as a transceiver option in the menu options. Matter of fact, I thi
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00316.html (12,015 bytes)

67. Re: [TenTec] Orion Com Port Speed ? (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 06:25:33 -0500
In the Orion Model 565 Programmer's Reference Guide, Revision 1.2, page 5, it says that "the interface parameters are fixed at 57,600 baud, No Parity, 8 Data bits, 1 Stop bit." You can download a cop
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00374.html (7,846 bytes)

68. [TenTec] Orion Firmware Updates (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 07:16:01 -0500
The other night it was time for me to install the most recent version of the Orion software. My Orion is only a couple of months old and came with version 1.369, so this was to be my first attempt at
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00460.html (7,749 bytes)

69. Re: [TenTec] 7800 reviews (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 21:49:02 -0500
I suspect that many new 7800 owners are going to be a little disappointed at the reviews and results. I also suspect that many bought the radio on the faith that ICOM would produce it according to "p
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00566.html (9,809 bytes)

70. [TenTec] SteppIR interface with the Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 21:35:35 -0500
Are any of you using the SteppIR transceiver interface with your Orion? I can't seem to get the interface to work between my Orion and the SteppIR control box. I have checked the pin outs on the conn
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00676.html (7,297 bytes)

71. [TenTec] Orion interface and the SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:39:45 -0500
I wanted to let everyone know that I have my new Orion successfully interfaced with my new 3 element SteppIR antenna. I would like to thank everyone that responded and especially George, KF9YR, who w
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00894.html (7,375 bytes)

72. Re: [TenTec] No Orion Update (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:27:37 -0500
I don't have any problem with these so called "dry spells." My Orion works just fine and that REALLY is the way that I like it. I have been reading some of the Icom and Yeasu boards and I really beli
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00958.html (8,935 bytes)

73. Re: [TenTec] Re: Contesting (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:46:28 -0500
Unfortunately Bob you are wrong. I asked the TenTec representative at the Huntsville Hamfest last Summer why they didn't use a color display on the Orion. His answer was simple. Cost! They felt that
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00257.html (10,642 bytes)

74. Re: [TenTec] Screen impact (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:42:38 -0500
I'm sure that we have all seen the price comparison (relatively speaking) of what a 1963 vintage Collins KWM-2 & power supply or a Drake TR-3 & power supply would cost in today's dollars. We also hav
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00295.html (13,865 bytes)

75. Re: [TenTec] contesting (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 22:21:09 -0500
Mike: It is more likely that the ones making the comments were the ones wishing that they had a FT-1000 or an IC-781. I have no doubt that ICOM will sell a lot of IC-7800s. But, I still see many nega
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00316.html (9,426 bytes)

76. Re: [TenTec] Unfinished (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:08:20 -0500
Sinisa: In general, I think that you are correct. ALL COMPANIES should meet their specs, but, sadly, few do. This applies across the board, not just to ham radios. But, I am satisfied with my Orion.
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00443.html (8,153 bytes)

77. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Icom 7800 Review Published (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 14:31:36 -0500
Why don't you suggest that option to them? Nothing says that they can't have a DSP/CPU upgrade from time to time. 73, Bernard, WA4OEJ would have
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00794.html (10,777 bytes)

78. [TenTec] Orion Bandscope (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 16:25:05 -0500
I have been playing around with the bandscope to observe its operation. Thus far, it doesn't seem too useful for much except locating signals on the bands. I was interested to see if I could determin
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00019.html (7,189 bytes)

79. Re: [TenTec] tentec orion (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 22:46:06 -0500
Ken: I received my new Orion last month after enjoying a FT-1000 for 10 years. I can safely tell you that the Orion is really a different type of radio. It will take quite a bit of getting used to. I
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00391.html (9,336 bytes)

80. Re: [TenTec] New $10K Yaesu HF (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 08:18:04 -0500
Bill: There was a comment, from Scott I believe, that TenTec would be announcing some new gear at the hamfest. Anyone, go by the TenTec booth and find out what it was? The Icom and Yaesu rigs might p
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00394.html (11,006 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
This search system is powered by Namazu