Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wdcook@ibm.net: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Filter confusion (score: 1)
Author: wdcook@ibm.net (Bill Cook)
Date: Sun, 03 Oct 1999 13:02:02 -0400
YES! -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com Search: htt
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00059.html (7,167 bytes)

2. [TenTec] Rcvr mod ideas (score: 1)
Author: wdcook@ibm.net (Bill Cook)
Date: Sat, 09 Oct 1999 18:10:25 -0400
This is a web site that has some interesting reading for folks who like to "tinker" with their Ten Tecs.... www.wolfenet.com/~kiwa/rxtips.html 73 Bill N4WC -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/te
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00238.html (6,610 bytes)

3. [TenTec] Type and Size of the Tentec Transformer (score: 1)
Author: wdcook@ibm.net (Wild Willy)
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 18:55:17 -0400
All things being equal; I do believe of the two listed amps the Centurion's IMD will be betterbecause of the lower anode supply. Bill N4WC -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submi
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00365.html (8,198 bytes)

4. [TenTec] OMNI VI mixer (score: 1)
Author: wdcook@ibm.net (Bill Cook)
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 18:17:41 -0400
John et al, I have two MCI SRA-3H and decided to try one in my OMNI VI (upg3). It works good. I cannot tell the difference from the original Synergy mixer. I am terminating the mixer with a Crystalon
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00537.html (9,116 bytes)

5. [TenTec] OMNI-VI Plus features lost from OMNI-V? (score: 1)
Author: wdcook@ibm.net (Bill Cook)
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 16:41:13 -0400
The 10 pole InRad filters have a 6-60 of 1.4. With both filters installed (9mc IF & 6mc IF) the sharpness (sp?) of the PBT is, how shall I say it, very sweet!!! Now add the InRad 2.1 to N2 (9mc IF) a
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00558.html (10,048 bytes)

6. [TenTec] Omni VI+ Freq "Jump" (score: 1)
Author: wdcook@ibm.net (Bill Cook)
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 1999 17:16:04 -0400
Pin 11 on the phase-lock-loop chip on the logic bd. needs to be adjusted for the narrowest possible pulse width (50mhz or better o'scope). The variable "L" for each xtal osc is your adjustment (tweak
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00104.html (8,894 bytes)

7. [TenTec] Re: Aligning Omni VI+ Freq "Jump" (score: 1)
Author: wdcook@ibm.net (Bill Cook)
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 17:10:37 -0400
The four sections of the Ten meter band are as follows: xtal 10a 28.0-28.5 xtal 10b 28.5-29.0 xtal 10c 29.0-29.5 xtal 10d 29.5-30.0 The computer bd. (logic bd) automagically switches in the correct x
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00167.html (9,023 bytes)

8. [TenTec] Omni VI plus - noise (score: 1)
Author: wdcook@ibm.net (Bill Cook)
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 17:36:52 -0400
Disconnect the coax between the bandpass filter bd and the IF audio bd. Does the noise drop? It should. Turn the "RF" gain all the way down. Turn the "Audio" gain all the way up. Scrutinize the noise
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00269.html (11,599 bytes)

9. [TenTec] Re: (Jim) OMNI-6+ Stuff (score: 1)
Author: wdcook@ibm.net (Bill Cook)
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 17:44:28 -0400
I have noticed this too. It was more pronouced with the stock filters and less pronounced with the Inrad types; 2.4 10p at 9 and 2.4 10p at 6. I noticed this effect, with the stock filters, varied sl
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00311.html (8,598 bytes)

10. [TenTec] OMNI V J310's (score: 1)
Author: wdcook@ibm.net (Bill Cook)
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 08:32:46 -0500
To: <tentec@contesting.com> All you have to do is vary the value of the 100 ohm source/drain resistor for each J310 until each device draws the same current. You really don't have to match them other
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00465.html (11,628 bytes)

11. [TenTec] OMNI V J310's (score: 1)
Author: wdcook@ibm.net (Bill Cook)
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 08:38:13 -0500
To: <tentec@contesting.com> To: <tentec@contesting.com> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Ideally you want to set the J310 to between 10 and 15 milliamps quiesent, total current drain. Yes they do run a li
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00467.html (18,147 bytes)

12. [TenTec] OMNI-6+ audio gain control (score: 1)
Author: wdcook@ibm.net (Bill Cook)
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 08:40:46 -0500
Let me know if you find an "Audio Taper" potentiometer that will fit in the same place as the original "Linear Taper" pot. Bill Cook N4WC -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submis
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00468.html (8,425 bytes)

13. [TenTec] Re: INRAD vs. TenTec - Yes Please (score: 1)
Author: wdcook@ibm.net (Bill Cook)
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 1998 17:46:10 -0500
I am using two of the INRAD 9meg 2.1kc filters in my omni VI up3. One is in all the time and the other is switched in when I want it. They are steeper than the originals and have noticeably less ripp
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00093.html (9,489 bytes)

14. [TenTec] Re: 2.4khz 9mhz pri INRAD Filters (score: 1)
Author: wdcook@ibm.net (Bill Cook)
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 10:12:15 -0500
George at INRAD will make a special order of 10pole, yes 10pole, 2.4khz wide 9.0015mhz center frequency drop-in primary filters if we have enough people call him and place an order. These will cost m
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00408.html (8,194 bytes)

15. [TenTec] Re: 2.4khz 9mhz pri INRAD Filters (score: 1)
Author: wdcook@ibm.net (Bill Cook)
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 19:58:34 -0500
Paul, Thank you for your concern. My experience with the INRAD filter is the center freq will be less than plus or minus 25hz. These filters are WIDTH spec'd at -0hz +100hz; typically they will fall
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00417.html (9,315 bytes)

16. [TenTec] Omni V & Autek WM-1 observation (score: 1)
Author: wdcook@ibm.net (Bill Cook)
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 18:16:11 -0500
Your ground is not a good RF ground. Ok for lightning maybe but not for RF. The earth is a dielectric not a conductor. To make a good RF ground is a royal pain in the you know where. Why don't you tr
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00435.html (7,508 bytes)

17. [TenTec] Re: 2.4khz 9mhz pri INRAD Filters (score: 1)
Author: wdcook@ibm.net (Bill Cook)
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 18:42:28 -0500
Paul, I replaced the BFO Osc, Buffer, and Agc xstrs with the metal can (4 pin) 2N918 type. These are supposedly very slow heating. Collins Radio (who I work for) always seemed to use these types in x
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00437.html (9,204 bytes)

18. [TenTec] Omni VI Plus SWR Indication (score: 1)
Author: wdcook@ibm.net (wdcook@ibm.net)
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1998 09:30:35 -0500
DO NOT touch the swr capacitor on the Low Pass filter board unless you are ready, willing, and ABLE to perform the complete power/ALC alignment as specified on the 9mc filter board. That swr variable
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00187.html (8,374 bytes)

19. [TenTec] centaur amp (score: 1)
Author: wdcook@ibm.net (wdcook@ibm.net)
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1998 09:37:26 -0500
A very good 500watt amp, especially when wired to 240vac. The fan is loud, LOUD; however a good set of headphones and Radio Shack mic foam cover solve that problem. Bill Cook N4WC -- FAQ on WWW: http
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00188.html (7,553 bytes)

20. [TenTec] Intermittent Freq Shift (score: 1)
Author: wdcook@ibm.net (wdcook@ibm.net)
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 17:22:48 -0400
I have an Omni VI upgrade 3. I have had this RX/TX chirp that has been described here recently. I called TT svc and they told me how to align U13 (PLL IC) on the logic bd with the xtal osc bd. I used
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-09/msg00407.html (7,655 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu