Mail Archive Search: <+from:w9ac@arrl.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:w9ac@arrl.net: 362 ]

Total 362 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ Frequency Display Problem Only On LSB (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:15:18 -0400; Asymmetrical passband curve of the filter. Paul, W9AC Paul, why would USB sound thinner AFTER alignment? Barry N1EU On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Paul Christensen <w9ac@arrl.net> wrote: Don't be t; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-06/msg00050.html (16,972 bytes)
82. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ BFO (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:51:57 -0400; Tom, "the SSB signal might not be centered in the filter passband causing distortion on the transmitted signal". That's correct and why a counter should be used -- or in the alternative, the BFO can; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-06/msg00060.html (11,626 bytes)
83. Re: [TenTec] O3 wish list (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 12:19:02 -0400; high speed display is missing the point entirely. The name of the game in panadaptors is RESOLUTION and the ability to twiddle sweep speed and AVERAGING parameters in such a way that best allows you; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00071.html (11,017 bytes)
84. Re: [TenTec] O3 wish list (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 09:17:52 -0400; Yes, but aren't many folks going to need a computer upgrade to efficiently run PowerSDR if they have older single core cpu's? That's why I like the SDR-IQ approach for a panadapter as it handles the; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00094.html (10,339 bytes)
85. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ Relay Clicking Correction (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 07:53:25 -0400; Tom, As I recall, the only relays used in the Omni 6+ are on the low-pass filter board, and the reed relay used for T/R (transmit/receive). Since the chatter problem manifests with the 80m panel butt; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00177.html (8,938 bytes)
86. Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 06:50:12 -0500; http://www.karinya.net/g3txq/temp/ground_zones_2.png Steve, Do you know if the elevation chart would change much if instead of a ground-mounted 80m quarter-wave vertical, a half-wave vertical dipole; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00191.html (13,154 bytes)
87. Re: [TenTec] Suggestions please (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2011 16:31:25 -0500; For example, when used in the multiband doublet application 200ft of Wireman 553 has about 2.6dB of loss at 28MHz. When wet, that figure rises to 9.3dB, based on the work of Wes Stewart N7WS. And the; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00247.html (10,166 bytes)
88. Re: [TenTec] ant (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:52:15 -0500; The link and the output coil do the balancing, I don't force balance by grounding the center of the output coil, though that often works. The grounding of the antenna side of the coil (typically betw; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00346.html (10,580 bytes)
89. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:38:33 -0500; The Corsair II is a fine radio, from what I saw of a friend's one. It might be adequate for all your hamming desires. However, another issue is how much longer will parts be available for it, should; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00246.html (10,798 bytes)
90. Re: [TenTec] OT: Is there a biography of Art Collins? was: EagleComparison (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 20:27:41 -0500; Jim, Look for "Arthur Collins - Radio Wizard," by Ben W. Sterns. 2002. ISBN: 09716416-0-9. Abebooks.com may have a few copies. Paul, W9AC -- Original Message -- From: "Jim Lowman" <jmlowman@sbcglobal; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00255.html (11,263 bytes)
91. Re: [TenTec] installing ladder line (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 17:41:35 -0500; Ladderline behaves differently from coax, and there might be a small impedance "bump" if you turn it abruptly through 90 degrees; however, in many ladderline applications that wont matter. Good advic; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00082.html (10,733 bytes)
92. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Eagle 599 (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 15:52:43 -0400; the new Eagle, and wonder why one doesn't just use the two +12V RCA connectors that Ten-Tec supplies on the back of the rig and rewire them as desired. That depends on how the RCA jacks are attached; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00046.html (9,444 bytes)
93. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:25:46 -0400; Probably the most significant way to sway TS-590 purchasers over to the Eagle is to include a 9 MHz I.F. port for use with LP-PAN, SDR-IQ, or QS1R as a panadapter and second Rx. For the minimal manuf; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00283.html (11,641 bytes)
94. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:49:38 -0400; I don't want to start a rhubarb over that here... just noting how many operators want one, and how TT should be well aware of it. The inclusion of the port is a no-brainer. It takes no R&D (yes, real; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00289.html (12,230 bytes)
95. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:27:37 -0400; I want the best darn radio I can get for the lowest possible price. I don't want to pay for options which I will NEVER use, like a Pan adapter. That's the single-most reason for the I.F. output. You; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00298.html (11,411 bytes)
96. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:43:00 -0400; I don't see "SPLIT" nor "REV" buttons on the Eagle's front panel. It will be interesting to see how one engages simple "DX split" without the use of rig control software. Using "A/B" is one way but t; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00303.html (10,229 bytes)
97. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:51:51 -0400; Excellent! That's a real competitive advantage over the TS-590. With the inclusion of the IF port, SDR-IQ (or LP-PAN), and N4PY control software, that's an extremely power operating combination, espe; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00305.html (13,097 bytes)
98. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:07:00 -0400; Too bad the reciver specs are not up to other Ten Tec radios. .5uV???? 73 Rick N4ASX MDS is -137 dBm/300Hz, preamp on. That's on-par with anything currently available. Paul, W9AC; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00350.html (10,489 bytes)
99. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Eagle (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:33:11 -0400; "I looked all over the Kenwood TX-590 product brochure and cannot find a clear specification for dynamic range. Not that it is the only spec of interest, but the Kenwood company says it is a "K-3" ki; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00454.html (9,921 bytes)
100. Re: [TenTec] Bandswitching the 253 with OMNI VII or Orion (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 14:21:31 -0400; Gary: An alternative is to use either quad array photo-Darlingtons packages for low-current interface applications... http://www.vishay.com/docs/83650/83650.pdf Or PhotoMOS, to directly drive relays; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-06/msg00217.html (12,156 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19]