Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w9ac@arrl.net: 362 ]

Total 362 documents matching your query.

321. Re: [TenTec] No 6M on the Orion (WTB: Ten-Tec 526 6N2) (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 18:01:53 -0400
That would be a good test and something that may be worth testing and measuring for all transceivers as part of the full ARRL lab reports. As a practical matter, I often tune my Pegasus for Hi-Fi SSB
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00253.html (12,106 bytes)

322. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter firmware problems. (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 15:54:28 -0400
One solution is to post new software/firmware as "BETA TEST ONLY." If you're up to it, download the software and be part of a group who is willing to test drive it and record and report any imperfect
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00495.html (11,863 bytes)

323. Re: [TenTec] Microphone on Pegasus (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 08:37:17 -0400
I've heard Carl with his Heil Goldline and Pegasus...outstanding audio quality! Paul, W9AC audio. OK act small have
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00002.html (11,264 bytes)

324. Re: [TenTec] Orion Specs? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 17:20:41 -0400
Jay, W5JAY had the unique opportunity to tour the Ten-Tec factory last weekend and make a purchase on a new RX-340 receiver. While he was there, he had a .JPG photo taken of himself next to an Orion
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00127.html (9,456 bytes)

325. Re: [TenTec] Qs-Triton IV (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 20:52:22 -0400
That's the truth Paul. Come to think of it, Ten-Tec is the only manufacturer of equipment where I do not have to conduct an exhaustive research into the serial number-mod sheet to see if it's a "80
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00249.html (7,477 bytes)

326. [TenTec] Pegasus R/C Internet Software (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 14:28:21 -0400
Anyone know what happened to the link for N2JEU remote control software to remote control a Pegasus or Jupiter transceiver via the Internet? I want to download the software but the link appears inact
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00419.html (7,021 bytes)

327. Re: [TenTec] Fw: [TenTec_Orion] Orion at HamCom (Arlington Texas) (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 08:24:11 -0400
Having various roofing filters available as an option is a GOOD thing. Otherwise, the radio's strong signal receive performance would be similar to the ICOM PRO and others.... -Paul, W9AC
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-06/msg00128.html (11,855 bytes)

328. Re: [TenTec] RX340 questions (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 16:53:50 -0400
knob has a skirt, and looks identical to the knob on my 302 tuning pod, but I can't seem to move it relative to the main knob. Yes, mine has adjustable drag. found a pinout in one drawing (figure 3-
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-06/msg00346.html (9,663 bytes)

329. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 13:32:34 -0400
I dusted off my Triton IV for the Field Day weekend and found that although the QSK is good, it still doesn't beat the Omni Six or Pegasus in terms of the T/R turnaround time. If I go past ~ 20 WPM
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-06/msg00374.html (7,674 bytes)

330. Re: [TenTec] eham centurion 0 review (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 14:04:50 -0400
That's eHam's prerogative. I didn't have a chance to see the "review" in question, but I suspect that the content crossed the border between one that is a bona-fide review and one that perhaps invok
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-06/msg00441.html (9,761 bytes)

331. Re: [TenTec] eham centurion 0 review - the "Orion" Factor. (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 14:15:49 -0400
And it has been said time-and-again and is probably worth repeating...that you have 30-days to evaluate their products at no risk (less shipping); well enough time to figure out if you want the prod
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-06/msg00442.html (10,039 bytes)

332. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 253 Tuner (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 11:54:34 -0400
I've always been interested in the model 253 tuner . How well does it perform its automatic matching function into a wide array of impedances? -Paul, W9AC
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00036.html (8,816 bytes)

333. Re: [TenTec] TT wants to go nose to nose with the K2???? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 16:33:46 -0400
Larry, From the Elecraft web site: "Adjustable 0.5-10 W PEP (PA option for higher power.)" The after-market PA option is going to be tricky for Elecraft. Neither Ten-Tec nor MFJ were successful in c
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00194.html (11,277 bytes)

334. Re: [TenTec] TT wants to go nose to nose with the K2???? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 16:54:08 -0400
And how long is the warranty?
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00195.html (9,048 bytes)

335. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 516 ---- Pre-Production Orders --- I'm missing something here. (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 17:30:37 -0400
It's not locked. You are not billed until shipment and can cancel at any time. Not exactly. You will be placed in a queue for delivery, with priority established by the order date. Great. You're app
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00198.html (7,716 bytes)

336. Re: [TenTec] TT wants to go nose to nose with the K2???? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 21:17:10 -0400
Great review of the new K2 product. Looks like there may be several subtle differences between the K2 and K2/100. I have heard that the K2's QSK is good, but not excellent, and certainly not in the T
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00211.html (14,362 bytes)

337. Re: [TenTec] Panoramic stereo receive (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 07:17:49 -0400
The creation of this effect is nothing new in the pro-audio world, but it is nice to see the concepts applied to communications. Back in the mid '70s, Orban/Parasound created the model 245 processor
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00290.html (12,245 bytes)

338. Re: [TenTec] RE: Explication (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 12:43:09 -0400
Right. Under dynamic conditions (voice, music, etc.), the ear is relatively insensitive to phase. The phase at 5kHz with respect to 1 kHz goes completely unnoticed in ABX double-blind comparisons. H
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00354.html (8,451 bytes)

339. Re: [TenTec] Re: Dayton news: Orion concern (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 18:13:29 -0400
is There are times when I feel like I have the Only Ten-Tecs with perfectly weighted tuning knobs. The amount of spin and weight on my Omni Six, RX-340 and Pegasus remote knobs seem ideal to me and
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00367.html (7,495 bytes)

340. Re: [TenTec] Re: Orion Concern (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 15:17:16 -0400
My God...there is a simple solution to all of this... Include a color video port (e.g., SVGA) on the rear of the Orion. The video port could be made an option: For $100 or so, a PC-compatible video
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00418.html (9,586 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu