Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w9ac@arrl.net: 361 ]

Total 361 documents matching your query.

221. Re: [TenTec] 40M Band Sweeps (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 22:32:02 -0500
No, I now see that is it much broader than just 40M. From my location, signal strength is about +35/S9 at any time of day. So, it does appear to be some form of governmental or research-based chirpi
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00192.html (9,223 bytes)

222. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII QSK users with good ears.... (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 10:18:18 -0500
Their reed relays are plenty fast enough and I see no real benefit over PIN diode switching except for longevity. Still, few relays fail in these rigs even after 20+ years. I did replace the T/R rel
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00295.html (9,285 bytes)

223. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII QSK users with good ears.... (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 14:02:26 -0500
The Omni 6/6+ also uses a handful of 1N4007 diodes as part of the T/R circuit, particularly for the 2nd Rx port. However, isolation characteristics are not nearly as good as a true PIN diode structu
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00303.html (8,859 bytes)

224. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII QSK users with good ears.... (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 18:45:21 -0500
At one time, Microsemi would "sample" them out to hams, in addition to their usual commercial and military customer base. That was back in the early '90s. Quite a few folks took advantage of it and
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00312.html (9,729 bytes)

225. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII QSK users with good ears.... (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 20:07:32 -0500
The mechanical mounting of a T/R relay has a profound effect on acoustical noise. To reduce noise of any relay in a T/R circuit, the idea is to reduce the effects of the PCB or chassis functioning a
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00316.html (10,241 bytes)

226. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII QSK users with good ears.... (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 21:15:02 -0500
I need to correct myself. That should have read Matsushita/Aromat RSD-12V. Tnx. Paul, W9AC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.cont
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00323.html (9,855 bytes)

227. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII QSK users with good ears.... (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 23:03:59 -0500
The Microsemi UM2110 was selected for its voltage handling capability (1 KV DC), rather than its power handling. Recall that the very first Omni Sixes suffered from poor port isolation (~ 30 dB). Th
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00328.html (10,497 bytes)

228. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII QSK users with good ears.... (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:14:10 -0500
are relay Tell us a bit more about the type of amp you're trying to interface and your level of comfort with soldering/de-soldering a couple components inside the rig. I can guide you through this,
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00343.html (9,748 bytes)

229. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII QSK users with good ears.... (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 21:05:06 -0500
and the amplifier. The relay in the amplifier is quite noisy, however when i'm not using the amp, the relay in the rig seems to be quite loud. Since i have the isolation relay at the power supply to
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00351.html (13,068 bytes)

230. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII QSK users with good ears.... (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:31:03 -0500
Good solution, but the extra circuitry required within an older non-TT amp to establish a keying loop is beyond the means of most users. The sampling of the Omni Six's "T" buss results in the closur
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00353.html (11,426 bytes)

231. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ receiver UHF intermod (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:51:59 -0500
filter in front of the Omni VI+. Has anyone encountered or heard of a similar UHF intermod problem with the Omni VI? Jack K1VT" D&eacute;j&agrave; vu. I ran into the exact issue back in '92 when I p
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00376.html (7,427 bytes)

232. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ receiver UHF intermod (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:47:29 -0500
But what I did not do in the 13 years thereafter was to check for the problem after the PIN diodes were installed. The Viking filter was so unobtrusive that it just stayed there, out of sight, out o
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00382.html (8,416 bytes)

233. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ QSK audio (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 07:00:46 -0500
Terry: It's been a while since I've owned an Omni 6, but removal of Plug 52 should have no effect on pilot lamp brightness. Removing the plug disables the side-tone wrap-around circuit -- a cause of
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00572.html (8,009 bytes)

234. [TenTec] 40M Band Sweeps (Request) (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:30:00 -0500
Last month, I sent the message below concerning an increased level of strong-signal 40M band sweeping at all hours of the day. At first, I thought these sweeps were local given the extremely strong i
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00229.html (11,518 bytes)

235. Re: [TenTec] 40M Band Sweeps (Request) (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 14:11:22 -0500
Ron, You're right. It would take quite an effort to have anything done. There would be few people, if any, in Congress who would support a measure that in any way diminishes the effectiveness of this
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00244.html (16,696 bytes)

236. Re: [TenTec] 40M Band Sweeps (Request) (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 22:00:59 -0500
http://www.dcs.lancs.ac.uk/~senior/chirpview.html Paul, W9AC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/te
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00269.html (7,649 bytes)

237. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI Chirp Report (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:23:14 -0500
Joe: If you check the TT archives from about 10-12 years ago, you'll see plenty of my posts on this subject. I spent about six months searching for the problem and ultimately came up with a solution
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00207.html (9,576 bytes)

238. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI Chirp Report (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 18:57:17 -0500
Don, First, not every Omni VI/VI+ exhibits the chirp phenomenon -- either through evolutionary changes, or component tolerances that allowed some Omnis to sound just fine. Next, check your data as it
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00218.html (10,270 bytes)

239. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI Chirp Report (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:24:15 -0500
Joe, I would experiment with both EPROMs and use the one that works best for you. If you are satisfied with the sound of the transmitted CW tone, then I would leave it alone. You may find that after
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00228.html (9,260 bytes)

240. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI Chirp Report (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:09:02 -0500
Don's input helped to shake some cobwebs loose... TT initially shifted the CW BFO from the USB crystal. Then, I believe in an effort to help eradicate the chirp, a later design shifted the LSB crysta
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00248.html (10,214 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu