Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w9ac@arrl.net: 362 ]

Total 362 documents matching your query.

201. Re: [TenTec] Sherwood Presentation (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 10:44:49 -0400
I must have fallen asleep at the delete button. I'll check the archives. Thanks! -Paul, W9AC
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00545.html (8,642 bytes)

202. Re: [TenTec] eHam! (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:05:18 -0500
Trouble is...eHam just devalued their site for the paying product advertisers too. The Product Reviews are (were) a good hook to get folks onto the site. Also, an argument can be made that hams were
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00310.html (9,333 bytes)

203. Re: [TenTec] IC 7800/FT2000D/TenTec-? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 08:52:53 -0500
You deserve the patting. Adding the Z3801A to the RX-340 simply removes any guess work. I am still trying to locate a the smaller HP 58540A GPS receiver. Anyone know where to look...other than eBay?
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00529.html (8,697 bytes)

204. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs. RX-340 TT Rcvrs. (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 19:56:28 -0500
At one time, I believe Carl had modified his 340 with a switchable 4 kHz roofing filter, similar to the Orion. So, with that filter installed, I suspect performance is equal to the Orion except in c
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00655.html (8,600 bytes)

205. [TenTec] Peagsus RS-232 to USB Conversion (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:32:33 -0500
I just upgraded to a new high-performance Dell 4600C. Like most new PCs, it has USB ports and NO RS-232 serial ports. I have several Belkin F5U003 RS-232-to-USB converters, but they refuse to work wi
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00879.html (8,051 bytes)

206. Re: [TenTec] Off Topic - Time (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 10:22:31 -0500
Does anyone really care? -Paul, W9AC
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00045.html (8,432 bytes)

207. Re: [TenTec] Off Topic - Time (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:43:49 -0500
the Relax. The original message contained: "Does anybody really care." Chicago Transit Authority. "Does anybody really know what time it is Does anybody really care If so I can't imagine why We've a
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00055.html (9,125 bytes)

208. Re: [TenTec] Will Orion be Ten-Tec's Last? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:26:07 -0500
Virginia, On the other hand, the COL makes the area quite attractive and with the recent surge in the nearby Charlotte and Asheville economy, I would take the quality of life in Appalachia over many
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00291.html (8,513 bytes)

209. Re: [TenTec] Will Orion be Ten-Tec's Last? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:25:02 -0500
Yes, pretty amazing. I have to believe that such conclusions are from folks that (a) have not been in the U.S. work force for the past several years (e.g., long term retirees); or (b) they are in th
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00314.html (9,856 bytes)

210. Re: [TenTec] Pegasus "Support" (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 20:21:15 -0500
Is this truly the case? Or, are we confusing "support" with "development?" I imagine that Ten-Tec will continue to *support* the Pegasus just as it does with every transceiver they have ever produce
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00736.html (9,709 bytes)

211. [TenTec] FS: Omni Six - Option 3 DSP (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:01:16 -0500
For Sale: Omni Six modified to "Plus" with factory option 3 upgrade. Beautiful condition - a solid "10" with no visible marks, wear or blemishes. Facts about this Omni Six: - Full output on all bands
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00342.html (8,287 bytes)

212. [TenTec] Re: Ten-tec Triton IV (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:13:01 -0500
For Sale: Late Ten-Tec analog Triton IV - ("Model 540" on front panel"). A solid "9" on a 0-10 scale, in very nice condition. With CW filter and N4LQ pure sine-wave sidetone mod. Non-invasive mod for
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00343.html (7,065 bytes)

213. Re: [TenTec] Orion Expanded Test Report (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 17:48:16 -0500
This may be yesterday's news, but I see that Elecraft has posted the Orion on its rig comparison page. Not surprisingly, they continue to show the K2 on top and even show the Orion's IP2 numbers in t
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00409.html (9,682 bytes)

214. Re: [TenTec] Re: K2 beats Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 07:34:52 -0500
Anyone know if the League has documented and disclosed its step-by-step Product Review testing methods and procedures? Specifically, is each measuring instrument calibrated against a traceable standa
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00467.html (9,926 bytes)

215. Re: [TenTec] Re: K2 beats Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 08:00:44 -0500
Anyone know if the League has documented and disclosed its step-by-step Product Review testing methods and procedures? Specifically, is each measuring instrument calibrated against a traceable standa
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00469.html (8,742 bytes)

216. Re: [TenTec] Re: K2 beats Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 10:47:13 -0500
Thanks Cliff, I just read the ARRL's Test Procedures Manual and while detail is provided with respect to individual procedures, as far as I can see, the document does not address equipment calibratio
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00478.html (11,607 bytes)

217. Re: [TenTec] Re: K2 beats Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 12:24:29 -0500
Agreed. It would be interesting to run performance tests on a sample of ten Orions and ten K2's from different builders and compare performance consistency across units. This may actually be more im
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00486.html (9,682 bytes)

218. Re: [TenTec] Here We Go Again (was Spectrum Hogs) (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 09:26:04 -0500
Exactly Barry. There is such limited use of Hi-Fi SSB at the moment, yet some folks just cannot pass up a opportunity to perpetuate controversy. The issue is not, and has never been, a real issue exc
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00697.html (9,381 bytes)

219. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 19:32:56 -0500
Previous Ten-Tecs run QSK whether in fast (full QSK) or slow (semi-break-in) modes. Unlike other manufacturers, only the receive recovery time changes. Since the second element exhibits no shortenin
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00986.html (10,180 bytes)

220. Re: [TenTec] Headphone clicks (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 14:13:42 -0500
you Not true. It is true that the loudness level from the headphone element can be adversely affected since current into the headphone element is resistance-limited with the inclusion of the method
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01043.html (9,560 bytes)

Current List: 201 - 220
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19]
This search system is powered by Namazu