Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w9ac@arrl.net: 362 ]

Total 362 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII QSK users with good ears.... (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 23:03:59 -0500
If the 1N4007 sort of did the job, probably a 1 watt or ten watt PIN diode would do a major part of the improvement the 1KW PIN diode does and would be more available. The Microsemi UM2110 was select
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00328.html (11,504 bytes)

142. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII QSK users with good ears.... (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:14:10 -0500
are relay Tell us a bit more about the type of amp you're trying to interface and your level of comfort with soldering/de-soldering a couple components inside the rig. I can guide you through this,
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00343.html (10,855 bytes)

143. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII QSK users with good ears.... (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 21:05:06 -0500
and the amplifier. The relay in the amplifier is quite noisy, however when i'm not using the amp, the relay in the rig seems to be quite loud. Since i have the isolation relay at the power supply to
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00351.html (13,382 bytes)

144. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII QSK users with good ears.... (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:31:03 -0500
I strongly urge one to use the "keying loop" provided by the Tentec Omni VI Plus system. Although it requires different and additional circuitry within the amp, it allows the switching to take place
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00353.html (11,876 bytes)

145. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ receiver UHF intermod (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:51:59 -0500
filter in front of the Omni VI+. Has anyone encountered or heard of a similar UHF intermod problem with the Omni VI? Jack K1VT" Déjà vu. I ran into the exact issue back in '92 when I purchased my Om
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00376.html (9,003 bytes)

146. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ receiver UHF intermod (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:47:29 -0500
biases weren't enough or the UHF signals were strong enough. Using true HF PIN diodes instead of switching or 1N4007 should also help prevent that mixing. And the external TVI filter has been proven
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00382.html (9,613 bytes)

147. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ QSK audio (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 07:00:46 -0500
Trying to get rid of the audio thumps when using QSK on my Omni VI+. I tried the W9AC mod, removing connector #52 from the if/af board, but other than increasing the brightness of the S-meter pilot l
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00572.html (8,714 bytes)

148. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII and Heil Pro Headset. (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 06:50:10 -0500
only to find out that I can't use the PTT cable with the rig. As soon as you plug the PTT cable into the radio it goes into transmit. OK, before anyone asks, yes I have checked the wiring! There's st
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00442.html (7,989 bytes)

149. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII keyer upgrade (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 21:09:15 -0400
"My issue is the OMNI VII keyer. To me the weighting adjustments are not sufficient to allow it to produce CW characters that match the ORION II. I'd like to see the CW weighting function be increase
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00209.html (8,506 bytes)

150. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI and non TT Amp (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:58:37 -0400
73 de K1ESE John" There's nothing wrong with the concept of ALC between the transceiver and an amp, but more often than not, the real-world implementation is nothing more than a "feel good" exercise
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00535.html (10,136 bytes)

151. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI and non TT Amp (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:26:56 -0400
PA to clipping??? If that never happens you are one cool ham." Generally, when I make a mistake, it's during the initial tune-up procedure and not during an operating event. Once I have maximized dr
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00549.html (11,916 bytes)

152. [TenTec] Omni VII Screen Color (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 20:38:30 -0400
Saw W4PA's video presentation of the Omni VII this morning. I was surprised to see that the background color of the screen was a very attractive blue color. Perhaps I'm missing it in the manual, but
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-09/msg00273.html (9,274 bytes)

153. Re: [TenTec] Amplifier Question (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:32:17 -0400
The relay in the Omni VI+, when used to key the amp, does not provide delay for RF output thus the amp is likely to switch hot. The TX EN is the correct way to delay the RF output from the Omni VI+ w
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-08/msg00437.html (9,923 bytes)

154. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 07:58:33 -0400
Is it because the radio has no appeal to participants in this list? Can it be that the radio's major appeal is to computer-bound folks who want to operate remotely? That's certainly the theme of Ten-
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-06/msg00344.html (12,374 bytes)

155. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII--Thanks (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 10:54:36 -0400
sitting on one's desk. That it does work well seems clear. But the emphasis of Ten-Tec and new owners does seem, by and large, to be on the digital features which are of no interest to me--witness t
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-06/msg00352.html (8,496 bytes)

156. Re: [TenTec] AUX Keying OminiVI Plus (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 17:21:57 -0400
Or if you don't want even the tiny click of a reed relay (someone has claimed it is not true QSK if you can hear a relay click) you could use an optocoupler. If the relay is fast enough, it is capabl
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00452.html (9,810 bytes)

157. Re: [TenTec] Cautionary Tale: Orion 13.8 V connector (long) (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 17:38:07 -0400
a pig tail with a much stouter dc connector...30 amp power poles. As a pig-tail, this is probably fine. However, I have measured as much as ~ 0.3 VDC dropped across properly crimped, standard-sized
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00480.html (10,457 bytes)

158. Re: [TenTec] Cautionary Tale: Orion 13.8 V connector (long) (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 18:53:18 -0400
Solder and stranded wires has another problem. Industry has proven for any time a wire is flexed, a crimp connection lasts much longer than a soldered connection. That's because in the soldered conne
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00486.html (9,714 bytes)

159. Re: [TenTec] QSK w/amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 09:35:16 -0400
I tapped into the T-line and keyed a transistor which in turn was used to key the 405 Amp's relay. Same here... When I owned an Omni Six, I decided to modify the external amp relay circuit to support
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00046.html (11,032 bytes)

160. Re: [TenTec] Amp Keying Relay Omni VI (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 23:24:23 -0400
The box switches 52v at 100ma. Will the relay connection on the back panel "Relay (N.O.)" handle that voltage and current? The Omni Six's external keying relay will switch this voltage and current, b
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00588.html (8,383 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu