Mail Archive Search: <+from:w3uls@3n.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:w3uls@3n.net: 162 ]

Total 162 documents matching your query.

81. [TenTec] Shootout at OK Corral (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 19:47:23 -0500; It's clear from the recent discussions on this reflector that we hams are now in the brave new world of software-driven transceivers and there's no turning back. In ten years, I suspect, there will b; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00523.html (8,915 bytes)
82. [TenTec] My kind of rig (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 09:07:45 -0500; "The next phase will be who is first with "in the radio" decoding of modes beyond CW/SSB/AM/FM and has Ethernet connectivity. Who ever brings those things out first in the mid-market price range will; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00548.html (7,357 bytes)
83. [TenTec] My kind of rig II (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 14:29:59 -0500; I got my Duanes crossed in first post. Should be Duane G, not C. 73, John, W3ULS; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00566.html (6,519 bytes)
84. [TenTec] Argonaut V virtues (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 16:15:33 -0500; I think the Argonaut V is a very successful design in every respect--performance, looks, ergonomics, firmware updates. It could use a couple of minor tweaks. The way the DSP filtering works is just t; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00609.html (6,662 bytes)
85. [TenTec] Cross-posting (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 16:20:21 -0500; It would be courteous to ask permission of the original poster before doing a re-posting. On the other hand, referencing a post seems OK. Barry has it about right, IMHO. 73, John, W3ULS; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00610.html (6,618 bytes)
86. [TenTec] One complicated radio! (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 09:09:41 -0500; "Xtal filter - 500 (or 1000 if you don't have the 500) DSP BW - 600 (adjust lower for QRM) Threshold - ~21 uV (vary +/- depending on QRN) Decay - 20 dB/S (vary +/- depending on QRN) RF Gain - 100 (ma; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00647.html (8,439 bytes)
87. [TenTec] One complicated radio! (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 20:00:59 -0500; My thanks to the people who responded both privately and on this reflector to my not-quite-facetious comments this a.m. regarding the Orion's seeming complexity. I can easily differentiate myself fro; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00677.html (9,942 bytes)
88. [TenTec] Bav. Cont. Club Review of Orion (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 12:31:57 -0500; A very helpful commentary. I think the reviewer may have used an IC-746 rather than an IC-746PRO in his comparison because he talks about cascaded 2.4 kHz SSB filters, something that is missing from; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00712.html (7,722 bytes)
89. [TenTec] Bavarian CC's Orion Review--Clarification (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 19:53:10 -0500; Rick Westerman, DJ0IP, one of the authors of the Bavarian CC's review of the Orion, sent me an e-mail, the pertinent parts of which follow: "Please allow me to state that the rig used for the test wa; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00724.html (7,466 bytes)
90. [TenTec] Waiting for Transceiver Nirvana (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 08:18:05 -0500; While waiting for zero hour of the CQ WW CW contest, these thoughts occur on the recent postings re software-driven base station rigs. 1. They are (with the odd exception of the IC-746PRO) damnably e; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00767.html (10,093 bytes)
91. [TenTec] Transceiver Nirvana/Transceiver Pricing (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 16:36:05 -0500; No matter how you slice it all ham radio gear today is less expensive in inflation-adjusted real terms than they have ever been at any time in history of ham radio, - for any level of performance. I; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00781.html (8,706 bytes)
92. [TenTec] Transceiver Nirvana--cont'd. (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 08:56:17 -0500; My prediction: within 3 years, you'll be able to purchase a QRP transceiver in the above configuration for under $200. 73, Dave, AA6YQ You can buy a 1w HF SDR now for $499.95. I'm thinking of picking; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00795.html (7,622 bytes)
93. [TenTec] OMNI VI+ Attributes (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 14:03:46 -0400; I agree with several previous posters re the OMNI VI's attributes. For a CW receiver, it's hard to beat. The IC-746PRO is also excellent, but it doesn't have stuff CW ops want to have at hand. Also v; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00053.html (7,448 bytes)
94. [TenTec] QTH.net Ten-Tec group (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 16:22:15 -0400; Jim Lowman has done a great job administering the Ten-Tec reflector groups. I belong to this one and the QTH group. I find the QTH group's postings are more focused and concise, whereas we can--and d; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00158.html (7,234 bytes)
95. [TenTec] Archive Searches (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 14:54:58 -0400; Will someone explain why the new ORION group archives can be searched by author, subject, date or thread, whereas this group is by date or thread only.--although it was not long ago that the other tw; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00221.html (6,744 bytes)
96. [TenTec] ORION SSB on-air challenge (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 08:00:59 -0400; I think I'll tip off one of my grandkids to give 'ol Art a call with their Argosy 525. I wonder what he'll have to say about that? 73, John, W3ULS; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00329.html (6,668 bytes)
97. [TenTec] OMNI VI BDR on Crowded Bands (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 14:47:59 -0400; Curt, NU7R, points out how good OMNIs are to use on crowded bands. I agree. However, some hams have pointed out over the years on this reflector that they have had trouble with OMNI VI's BDR when ver; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00515.html (7,286 bytes)
98. [TenTec] Orion "spot" button? (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 14:04:38 -0400; Can someone enlighten me as to whether the Orion has a "spot" button for zero-beating a CW sig? I don't see one on the front panel photos. 73, John, W3ULS; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-09/msg00011.html (7,018 bytes)
99. [TenTec] Three Items (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 10:56:00 -0400; "I sold my Omni VI, option 3 to help finance the Orion. I'm not sorry that I did so." I'm glad he did so. I now own Dave's OMNI VI. On CW, it is one fine radio. Last night I worked AB9DU/VE1 on Cape; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-09/msg00095.html (9,596 bytes)
100. [TenTec] Future Thoughts (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:37:15 -0400; Ron, interesting post. You have a much better feel for ten-Tec than I do. I would add that the Argonaut V, with some fiddling and the addition of 100 watt output, could supercede the Jupiter. I've he; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-09/msg00183.html (7,489 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]