Mail Archive Search: <+from:vhklein@ptd.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:vhklein@ptd.net: 168 ]

Total 168 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] Vertical Dipole "Fringe Benefits" (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 07:20:30 -0400; Rick, Dave is right. What you are calculating with the formula you show is cm/ft. If you divide it by 100 to get meters/ft and invert it you will get the correct 3.28 ft/m. Just remember a meter is a; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00420.html (9,868 bytes)
42. Re: [TenTec] 7/20/05: Ten-Tec announces ORION II (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 08:56:26 -0400; Wait a minute, they DID say there was a new radio coming out in October, didn't they? How much more advance warning would you expect? Just like when the Orion replaced the Omni VI, there were people; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00661.html (9,576 bytes)
43. Re: [TenTec] Googke issues (was Legacy port elimination plan) (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:38:21 -0400; Google has bought an interest in a BPL company and is fininancing the expansion of BPL. =Vic= WA4THR from [Steve Baron - KB3MM] [Permanent Link][Original] To: <gsm@mendelson.com>,"Discussion of Ten-T; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01105.html (7,384 bytes)
44. Re: [TenTec] Paragon Problem Solving Info Needed (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 22:40:02 -0400; To: Tentec <tentec@contesting.com> Subject: [TenTec] Paragon Problem Solving Info Needed From: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net> Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@cont; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01280.html (9,353 bytes)
45. Re: [TenTec] Paragon Problem Solving Info Needed (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 20:36:46 -0400; Nice sleuthing! Thanks for reporting back, always nice to know how these things work out. =Vic= WA4THR Problem solved. Bad 1N914 diode on the Logic board not allowing ROM access for the transition fr; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00082.html (7,542 bytes)
46. Re: [TenTec] Paragon Question (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 07:44:52 -0400; Carl's comments about the band stacking registers is true, but substituting a readily available Giehl chip provides 585 with the same user interface and band stacking registers as the 586. Of more im; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00158.html (9,543 bytes)
47. Re: [TenTec] Paragon Question (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 19:14:38 -0400; Right, Carl. Based on off-list comments I may not have been as clear as I could have been before. The use of a Giehl chip changes the front panel user interface on the Paragon to be essentially the s; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00180.html (9,872 bytes)
48. Re: [TenTec] Problem with Paragon I (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 08:26:10 -0400; Curious problem. With the "dashes" showing and a battery connected, have you tried the reset button on the side? Failing that "fix" I would look at the connections of the boards (particularly the mai; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00482.html (7,992 bytes)
49. Re: [TenTec] Problem with Paragon I (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 08:01:39 -0400; Thanks for the information, Bob. You seem to have a wealth of knowledge on the Paragon. Actually, mine is working beautifully...best rig I have ever owned and a joy to use. Roger was the one having t; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00519.html (9,463 bytes)
50. [TenTec] KR 1-A Keyer (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 18:37:33 -0400; I recently picked up a clean Ten Tec KR 1-A Keyer, because I love my old Ten Tec paddles that I have on my homebrew keyer and this matched the color (woodgrain/cream) of my old Triton I. I was thinki; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00435.html (6,994 bytes)
51. Re: [TenTec] Paragon knob (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 07:03:15 -0500; I think the skirt adjustment was a later offering on the Omni VI, perhaps, and is sometimes retrofitted to the Paragon. Still, the drag on the main tuning knob is adjustable and controlled by some co; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-10/msg00418.html (8,259 bytes)
52. [TenTec] Paragon on RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 09:39:50 -0500; I have a very nice 585 Paragon that I recently decided to run some RTTY with. I am connecting with a Kantronics KAM to the Mark/Space jack on the rear panel to run "true" FSK, and selecting RTTY (shi; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00035.html (7,204 bytes)
53. Re: [TenTec] Paragon on RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 11:01:55 -0500; Thanks for the reply, Bob. I don't think it is a problem with the shift. My receive technique is usually to tune until the mark or space moves off the LED indicators on the KAM, note the frequencies,; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00039.html (12,893 bytes)
54. Re: [TenTec] Paragon on RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 06:38:49 -0500; I have just used the RIT to offset the receive when needed, Paul. Not a big problem at all and has, so far, only come up when working stations running AFSK. I need to make a few more contacts, perhap; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00052.html (8,843 bytes)
55. Re: [TenTec] Paragon on RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 06:47:04 -0500; Well, I took Stan's comment to mean they used the BFO for LSB to also serve for RTTY without allowing a different offset. That being said, a later direct comment from him said he had forgotten about; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00053.html (8,951 bytes)
56. Re: [TenTec] Airpax circuit breaker for Orion (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 22:48:05 -0500; Ten Tec design philosophy for radio finals is to run them full power into any load, rather than folding back the power as SWR increases. The only potential for damage then is if the finals draw too m; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00046.html (9,936 bytes)
57. Re: [TenTec] RS-232 Control codes for PARAGON (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 06:38:08 -0500; Yes, I use computer control of my 585 Paragon all the time using a program I wrote based on some of the original Ten Tec program concepts. My logging program (HyperLog) also interfaces with the Parag; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00180.html (8,625 bytes)
58. Re: [TenTec] Paragon mic (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:05:11 -0500; I have a Shure 444 that I used on my old Triton, but an Argonne AR-57 dual-element crystal mic always got better reports. On my Paragon I use a TT-705 and get unsolicited compliments on the transmit; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00562.html (8,175 bytes)
59. Re: [TenTec] Help (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 08:10:31 -0500; Hey, Ken, and congrats on the new radio. Not quite enough info to help much, but that tripping of the P/S is designed to prevent a final meltdown and TT's preferred protection method rather than scal; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01029.html (7,738 bytes)
60. Re: [TenTec] PARAGON vs OMNI V VI VI+ (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 18:28:15 -0500; As Ten Tec's first synthesized HF radio, I think some maligned the Paragon unfairly. There were some teething issues (reminds me of what you read on the Orion) due to some mechanical soldering proble; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00500.html (8,785 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]