Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:toby423@earthlink.net: 317 ]

Total 317 documents matching your query.

201. [TenTec] 2030 Posted (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 16:11:13 -0500
Version 2030 is posted on the RF Squared .Com for the O2. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00235.html (6,741 bytes)

202. Re: [TenTec] Orion firmware statistics and drift info (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 22:05:55 -0500
I have noticed this problem and installed a CPU fan to blow across the top on the Orion and this keeps the heat build up down considerably. I hung the fan under the shelf above the Orion attached wit
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00245.html (12,396 bytes)

203. Re: [TenTec] Adjustment on Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 08:51:03 -0500
On the Orion 1 that is the audio pot. Toby bottom side of the Orion II, roughly under the S-meter. Does anybody know what it's for? _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00256.html (7,402 bytes)

204. Re: [TenTec] Orion II questions (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 20:15:13 -0500
I am in agreement with you as far as the RF gain and the S meter is concerned. I have heard arguments for having the S meter go up as the RF gain goes down. But my preference would be to leave the wa
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00277.html (9,912 bytes)

205. Re: [TenTec] S-meter and RF Gain (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 13:41:09 -0500
Bill, I have seen these comments or arguments before about the RF gain and s meter, and I never had any problems setting the RF gain or threshold, In fact I use an old version of the firmware 1.367 w
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00285.html (9,995 bytes)

206. [TenTec] S meter and RF gain (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 17:27:21 -0500
<<< With the new RF gain S meter interaction, the S meter is always correct if the signal is above the RF gain setting>>> IF THE SIGNAL IS ABOVE THE RF GAIN SETTINGS..... This is precisely my point,
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00299.html (7,722 bytes)

207. Re: [TenTec] S meter and RF gain (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 19:13:16 -0500
Bill, there is nothing to get. I am merely stating that I would like the RF gain to be independent of the S meter and prefer it to work like it does in the 1.xxx version of software, instead of the w
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00305.html (8,971 bytes)

208. Re: [TenTec] Ocean noise (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 14:01:14 -0500
Must have missed which rig you are talking about... the Orion or the Orion 2? by side with no antenna the Orion has much moee internal noise. I think it is just a fact of life. 50-60%..still suspect
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00371.html (27,435 bytes)

209. Re: [TenTec] Ocean noise (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 15:34:38 -0500
Check and see if you might have the sub-receive AF gain cracked open a little. I often have had excess noise and find my sub receive AF gain is barely cracked open. it [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesti
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00375.html (31,410 bytes)

210. Re: [TenTec] ocean noise (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 18:14:31 -0500
Tommy, I was one of those suggessting you check the sub receive AF gain. Sometimes it looks like it is turned down, but in reality it is cracked open just a little bit. You may not even see a little
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00449.html (10,572 bytes)

211. [TenTec] 2054 BETA (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:22:11 -0500
This is interesting, since this release is called a BETA version one could conclude that testing could be still going on, and that this is what they have so far to release. Toby W4CAK _______________
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00485.html (7,167 bytes)

212. Re: [TenTec] 2054 BETA (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:50:19 -0500
Not frustrated at all......very happy to see progress being made for the Classic Orion. what _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.con
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00496.html (8,778 bytes)

213. Re: [TenTec] V2.0 for the original Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:51:20 -0500
Set the rolloff to 180 and the EQ to -8. Be careful with the SP. Immediately, bought to with it _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00520.html (9,017 bytes)

214. [TenTec] Version 2.xxx (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:26:57 -0500
As I work quite a bit of cw, I do not like the loss of audio between 200hz and 100hz. It is more than a "subtle loss" as explained in the website notes. In my 1.xxx version there is no loss of audio,
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00533.html (6,971 bytes)

215. Re: [TenTec] Orion I V2 beta (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:48:49 -0500
Mark, The audio indeed is rougher on the edges and not as robust as in 1.xxx versions. Here are a few other issues for someone to confirm and then report........... 1. SP is not working, very little
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00598.html (9,541 bytes)

216. [TenTec] Fw: Orion I V2 beta (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:12:11 -0500
Toby, Not a member of the TT list but I can confirm your findings on items 1 and 2: 1. SP is not working, very little change between settings of 1 to 9 2. The rolloff is acting like a VFO, the higher
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00617.html (8,124 bytes)

217. [TenTec] Loss of Audio in 2054 (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:55:03 -0500
The loss of audio between 200hz and 100hz when in cw mode is problematic for me, even though I have seen some posts that indicate it is not big deal for others. I commonly narrow down the cw filters
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00645.html (7,471 bytes)

218. Re: [TenTec] Loss of Audio in 2054 (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:09:08 -0500
Changing the taps does not seem to make any difference. By the way, Ten Tec calls it a 3.5 db loss. Toby W4CAK using to _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@cont
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00648.html (8,371 bytes)

219. Re: [TenTec] Orion I V2 Beta (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:14:21 -0500
In addition to very little change between 1 to 9 on the Speech processor, there is also very little change in gain going from a setting of 10 to a setting of 90 on the mike gain. Toby W4CAK _________
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00649.html (9,128 bytes)

220. [TenTec] Orion Upgrade (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:03:25 -0500
Ron Spencer wrote..... anything above 5?>>> This seems to be a problem expecially on cw, but not so much on SSB. NR seems to be effective on SSB except for a slight loss of audio volume when engaged.
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00664.html (6,951 bytes)

Current List: 201 - 220
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]
This search system is powered by Namazu