Mail Archive Search: <+from:stevebaron@starlinx.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:stevebaron@starlinx.com: 610 ]

Total 610 documents matching your query.

41. [TenTec] Thanks for Pegasus info (score: 1): Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM); Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 17:11:15 -0000; That's interesting. Why would the time be correct only when connected to the radio ? Is there a clock in the radio ? be -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@cont; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00047.html (9,039 bytes)
42. [TenTec] Thanks for Pegasus info (score: 1): Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM); Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 18:04:36 -0000; AHA! That is very important. The offset is incorrect in the INI file. If that is true, then the correct/incorrect clock time has nothing to do with being connected to the radio! http://www.contesting; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00048.html (12,461 bytes)
43. [TenTec] Thanks for Pegasus info (score: 1): Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM); Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 19:00:39 -0000; YEP - Sounds like a mixture of cockpit error, maybe poor documentation, mis-information of mis-uderstnading of info, etc. worked change the is to be -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00050.html (9,982 bytes)
44. [TenTec] Thanks for Pegasus info (score: 1): Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM); Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 01:35:11 -0000; Thanks for the info. Yes, 3.1 is the pits. There is improvement when one moves to 95, but my understanding is that Pegasus software is 16 bit so must share a single virtual machine even in WIN 95. A; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00087.html (17,735 bytes)
45. [TenTec] Pegasus once again!! (score: 1): Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM); Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 15:28:01 -0000; Just a question of wide filter and center frequency - you hear both sides. -- Original Message -- From: Steve Ellington N4LQ <n4lq@iglou.com> To: Greg Hodsdon <k7kj@teleport.com>; Tim Cook <timcook@e; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00150.html (9,877 bytes)
46. [TenTec] CAT and the Omni VI+ (score: 1): Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM); Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 00:04:23 -0000; OK. Looks like OMNI VI can operate either way - announce changes or wait for a poll. With DX4WIN, announce changes CANNOT be used - DX4WIN must poll the radio. Guess that means when you change someth; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00302.html (9,552 bytes)
47. [TenTec] Pegasus (score: 1): Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM); Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 04:09:46 -0000; Sounds reasonable. Like he says, it isn't an OMNI - but a lot of bang for the buck. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests:; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00348.html (9,348 bytes)
48. [TenTec] Pegasus: First Impressions (score: 1): Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM); Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 14:50:42 -0000; Thanks for the 40 M info. Good to know that type of stuff. much -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@conte; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00435.html (9,088 bytes)
49. [TenTec] Pegasus: First Impressions (score: 1): Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM); Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 17:44:20 -0000; Isn't fundamental overload simply blocking ? get -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com Probl; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00469.html (13,091 bytes)
50. [TenTec] Mics in general (score: 1): Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM); Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 19:30:48 +0100; Have you ever looked at the the 705 implementation. Those elements typically are very flat response and put out a fairly low level signal - wonder if that is what the 705 implements . --Original Mess; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00023.html (15,900 bytes)
51. [TenTec] Pegasus Programmin Specification, Downloadable (score: 1): Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM); Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 19:57:10 +0100; Think TT has been saying that the manual is not finished yet and will be on the site 'shortly'. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrativ; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00142.html (9,480 bytes)
52. [TenTec] Omni Vi freq drift and poor keyer? (score: 1): Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM); Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 02:24:12 +0100; If you are saying that TT says frequency drift if 50 Hz during warm up and that is what the rig does, that is OK. If that is too much, one keeps truckin. --Original Message-- From: Steve Ellington N4; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00158.html (14,330 bytes)
53. [TenTec] Pegasus Programmin Specification, Downloadable (score: 1): Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM); Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 12:44:31 +0100; A little confusing.. Is TRLog saying they will not support the oMNI VI ? And TT should make it like the 850 ? -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00167.html (12,409 bytes)
54. [TenTec] Pegasus Programmin Specification, Downloadable (score: 1): Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM); Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 14:34:16 +0100; You sort of hit the nail on the head. The design of these interfaces is absolutely atrocious...a bit twiddlers delight. Any one implementing the software for an interface may even have to worry about; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00170.html (17,183 bytes)
55. [TenTec] Software control. (was Pegasus Programmin Specification, Downloadable) (score: 1): Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM); Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 15:18:50 +0100; Does the OMNI VI: Use any handshaking ? Really use BCD ? --Original Message-- From: Robert <bigmack@nortexinfo.net> To: tentec@contesting.com <tentec@contesting.com> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Date:; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00175.html (16,914 bytes)
56. [TenTec] Pegasus Programmin Specification, Downloadable (score: 1): Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM); Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 16:23:24 +0100; Good gosh ! Heresy ! Thuinking about what you are going to do before toy do it - radical concept ! <gr, gr, gr> --Original Message-- From: Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, P.E. <geraldj@ames.net> To: Ten-Tec I; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00180.html (10,194 bytes)
57. [TenTec] Pegasus Programming and other items of wishful nature (score: 1): Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM); Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 16:37:05 +0100; I think you highlight two problems: If the communications between the Pegasus and computer is NOT identical to the OMNI V or VI (and maybe some other rigs), current contest programs will not work e.g; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00181.html (10,256 bytes)
58. [TenTec] Pegasus Programming and other items of wishful nature (score: 1): Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM); Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 16:43:29 +0100; The Pegasus does not have a special interface. It is simply a asynchronous serial link. Since (my understanding is tha)t the Pegasus software is done in VB (perhaps an older version since 16 bit is a; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00182.html (10,173 bytes)
59. [TenTec] Omni V and Writelog (score: 1): Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM); Date: Fri, 8 Oct 1999 04:57:49 +0100; The OMNI V uses three wires for the interface as Carl has properly ndicated. TD, RD, and signal ground (pin 7 at the OMNI). Approximately 12 of the 25 pins on the D connector on the V are used for ot; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00196.html (11,178 bytes)
60. [TenTec] Omni V and Writelog (score: 1): Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM); Date: Fri, 8 Oct 1999 05:03:08 +0100; OOPS! Forgot to mention that the V will only operate at 1200 bps. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@con; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00197.html (9,190 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]