Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:shristov@ptt.yu: 307 ]

Total 307 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [TenTec] Ant couplers (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 15:50:40 -0500
They just transfer power to the feedline, and the road to antenna may still be very lossy. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00023.html (7,089 bytes)

82. Re: [TenTec] Open wire feed (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:00:51 -0500
This condition is not automatically satisfied by using an open wire feedline. A common mode current may exist on open wires just as easily as on coax. The open wire feedline owes its "low loss" prope
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00025.html (7,465 bytes)

83. Re: [TenTec] S-meter and RF Gain (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 16:00:25 -0500
In order to be useful, S meter movement must be synchronized with gain decrease caused by either AGC or manual RF GAIN. That's how it works in "ordinary" receivers. If the current Orion implementatio
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00289.html (8,396 bytes)

84. Re: [TenTec] Ocean noise (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 16:22:01 -0500
There are two facts. 1. Default Orion gain is higher that default gain of FT1000. 2. Orion has flat audio response, while FT1000 rolls off from 1 kHz, reaching more than -10 dB at 2.7 kHz. This is th
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00375.html (9,364 bytes)

85. Re: [TenTec] Orion II manual / firmware for 565 / 8P with Orion II (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:13:56 -0500
Is Orion 2 schematic available? In particular, is the codec clock synchronized to the main TCXO now? It wasn't in Orion 1, which made diversity reception marginal. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00593.html (9,196 bytes)

86. Re: [TenTec] Orion II manual / firmware for 565 / 8P with Orion II (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:16:21 -0500
Thank you for information, gentlemen. The frequency difference may be caused by firmware, even with all clocks locked to TCXO. The only reliable way is to look at the actual codec clock source. In Or
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00684.html (9,515 bytes)

87. Re: [TenTec] Orion II manual / firmware for 565 / 8P with Orion II (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 01:58:44 -0500
Yes, it's the same oscillator, but it's not used the same way. On both receivers, the received frequency is a weighted sum of two reference frequencies, but weighing factors are not the same: Fmain =
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00693.html (10,081 bytes)

88. Re: [TenTec] New Orion 2 manual (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:56:55 -0500
There are "FREQUENCY STABILITY NOTES" added on page 6, describing some abracadabra supposedly improving the frequency stability to that of the TCXO. This is also advertised on the Orion II web page a
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00850.html (8,009 bytes)

89. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] Orion II Noise Blankers (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 02:29:56 -0500
How does one see it? 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01225.html (9,440 bytes)

90. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] Orion II Noise Blankers (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:46:24 -0500
There is no need to use a hex editor. The RUF file is an ordinary text file in a well known S record format. 73, Sinisa
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01242.html (9,923 bytes)

91. Re: [TenTec] O2 shipments (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 11:10:31 -0500
Or O3, whichever happens first. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00254.html (8,301 bytes)

92. [TenTec] Orion II Schematic (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 08:12:28 -0500
Is Orion II Schematic available? 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00282.html (6,586 bytes)

93. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Curiosity (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 09:37:36 -0500
As you probably know, Orion's ALC LED has to blinks while you speak. If not, drive is insufficient. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00312.html (8,471 bytes)

94. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] O2 versus Orion (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 12:05:30 -0500
No, the ADC sampling frequency was independent of the TCXO, and as a consequence, all DSP-related RX/TX frequencies were independent of the TCXO. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00319.html (8,198 bytes)

95. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] O2 versus Orion (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:50:09 -0500
It depends on how you do it. In Orion's case sub-Hz accuracy is achieved easily by beating two tones of similar amplitudes, that is, the SPOT tone and the received signal's tone. No S meter is needed
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00390.html (7,516 bytes)

96. Re: [TenTec] Zerobeat & Radio Features - was O2 vs Orion (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:59:57 -0500
Indeed, old TS570 had something like that, and it was suprisingly fast and accurate. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00392.html (7,281 bytes)

97. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] O2 versus Orion (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:37:57 -0500
With equal amplitudes we have: COS (x) + COS (y) = 2 * COS ((x + y) / 2) * COS ((x - y) / 2) Example: freq 1 = 800.10 Hz freq 2 = 800.00 Hz what one hears is an 800.05 Hz tone with its amplitude vary
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00396.html (7,972 bytes)

98. Re: [TenTec] Orion II tuning questions (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 07:28:12 -0500
Actually, there are 256 steps when FAST and only 64 steps when SLOW. This is about quarter of FT1000MP's steps. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00881.html (7,983 bytes)

99. Re: [TenTec] Orion II tuning questions (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:00:08 -0500
How about trying to reduce BW, or AF GAIN or something similar, while sending? 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00895.html (7,854 bytes)

100. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Tuning Questions (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:23:09 -0500
On the contarry, I find it very reasonable to adjust BW, RIT or something similar while sending in order to ensure better reception. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00899.html (9,229 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu