Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:shristov@ptt.yu: 307 ]

Total 307 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TenTec] Further Orion Sub Receiver (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 14:26:31 -0500
It is NOT well as long as AM broadcast audio is limited to 3 kHz. V1 firmware was capable of full 6 kHz AM audio. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00793.html (7,600 bytes)

62. Re: [TenTec] Further Orion Sub Receiver (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 16:31:13 -0500
Why? Only to prove that V2.056 can do something albeit half-way? I'd prefer it the way it was done for almost a century, and it worked that way in V1, so it's clearly a degradation. 73, Sinisa YT1NT,
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00800.html (7,933 bytes)

63. Re: [TenTec] Orion Sub Receiver BW (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 17:21:51 -0500
Of course 10 kHz may be too much, but 8 or 9 kHz BW is actually transmitted, and a 3 kHz V2 audio sounds substantially worse than 4 or 4.5 KHz V1 audio. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00806.html (9,351 bytes)

64. Re: [TenTec] Orion Sub Receiver BW (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 17:03:33 -0500
AM demodulation is a nonlinear process and AM BW testing using noise input is meaningless. The filter bandwidth cannot be reliably estimated from the resulting audio spectrum measurements because of
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00807.html (10,507 bytes)

65. Re: [TenTec] Orion Sub Receiver BW (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 20:04:45 -0500
In fact, 14 kHz refers to the IF center frequency, and the sampling rate is 56.09375 kHz. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00825.html (9,319 bytes)

66. Re: [TenTec] Orion Sub Receiver BW (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 04:53:46 -0500
The workload is proportional to filter length (199 taps default), and not related directly to the bandwidth. The number of coefficients is most dependent on the required filter slope, measured in dB/
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00852.html (9,328 bytes)

67. Re: [TenTec] Further Orion Sub Receiver -- Some results (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:05:28 -0500
That's incorrect. -33 dB is 2.4 % THD. 0.05 % THD would be -66 dB. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00861.html (8,654 bytes)

68. Re: [TenTec] Further Orion Sub Receiver -- Some results (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 19:47:32 -0500
The correct formula is: harmonic distortion in % = 100 * (RMS voltage of harmonics) / (RMS voltage of fundamental) It's "total" (THD) if all harmonics are included, otherwise it is "partial". 73, Sin
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00869.html (8,566 bytes)

69. [TenTec] Orion AM RX Performance Measurements (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 11:37:34 -0500
A fixed width font is recommended to view the data correctly. Part One - Total Harmonic Distortion == Main RX, 3750 kHz, AM PREAMP OFF, ATTN OFF, RF GAIN 100 ROOF 20 kHz, BW 6000 Hz, PBT 0 Hz modulat
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00887.html (11,659 bytes)

70. Re: [TenTec] Orion AM RX Performance Measurements (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 15:59:32 -0500
A single carrier is not a problem unless it's a very weak signal and both the noise and the signal trigger AGC action. This was discussed earlier. With two or more carriers in the passband, too fast
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00896.html (9,764 bytes)

71. Re: [TenTec] Orion AM RX Performance Measurements (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 15:34:03 -0500
Orion I. My impression is that some kind of distortion appears with dynamic signals only, but I was unable to produce it systematically and measure it. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00897.html (9,762 bytes)

72. Re: [TenTec] Orion AM RX Performance Measurements (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 15:43:55 -0500
Part Four - THD & IM with PBT offset == Sub RX, V2.056, 900 kHz, AM BW 6000 Hz, PBT = 2000 Hz HANG 0.3 seconds, 5 dB/s measured at speaker output with external 4 Ohm speaker connected Total Harmonic
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00912.html (9,499 bytes)

73. Re: [TenTec] Questions about NR i.e. Orion (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 17:21:53 -0500
NR is an adaptive filter, and adaptive filter IS a filter, its sole purpose being that of bandwidth reduction. What makes is different from "ordinary" filters is the adaptive method of tuning, and n
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01011.html (9,070 bytes)

74. Re: [TenTec] Questions about NR i.e. Orion (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 21:56:31 -0500
How quick is "quickly" in real Orion operation? 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01015.html (8,482 bytes)

75. Re: [TenTec] Questions about NR i.e. Orion (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:21:58 -0500
MDS, S/N and similar measurements with NR on must be peformed completely with the signal present, and not by switching the signal on and off. If the signal goes off, NR would readapt, so the sytem be
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01023.html (9,290 bytes)

76. [TenTec] A Look at NR (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 23:30:27 -0500
Orion I Noise Reduction Testing == Tested with NR settings of 1 and 9, firmware V1.373b5. Testing performed in LSB mode, PBT = 0 Hz, BW = 2500 Hz Steady input consisting of white noise plus a CW sign
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01048.html (9,721 bytes)

77. Re: [TenTec] A Look at NR (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 00:11:01 -0500
I've tested 1.373b5, didn't have time to do it with V2. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01054.html (9,091 bytes)

78. Re: [TenTec] A Look at NR (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 00:12:39 -0500
Not, the job is actually easiest with a steady carrier. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01055.html (9,182 bytes)

79. Re: [TenTec] Orion II NR Performance Measurements (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 18:35:41 -0500
Well, it's probably fair to say that both things matter, and one is no substitute for the other. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01229.html (8,613 bytes)

80. Re: [TenTec] The ORION II sure makes me happy (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 20:34:54 -0500
Thanks God, unpleasant truth looses against the pleasant untruth :-) 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01372.html (7,298 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu