Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:shristov@ptt.yu: 307 ]

Total 307 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] V 1.372 for Orion (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 17:55:26 -0400
It is the codec clock that matters here, and both codecs use a single crystal; so the problem is elsewhere. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA -- YU DX Contest April 15/16, 2006 http://yudx.net 2 x 8 hours of w
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00391.html (8,862 bytes)

42. Re: [TenTec] Reflector is getting effective at killing sales (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 10:20:38 -0400
On the contrary, the "I hate the Orion" crowd will sell their Orions at much reduced prices, so the rest of us will benefit by buying them out quickly. And if someone from the rest of us happens to f
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00436.html (9,360 bytes)

43. Re: [TenTec] V2.055 bug /watch out on 60 meters! (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 01:54:08 -0400
Believe it or not, the "565 Manual" does not even attempt to define how is the the TX mode established! Therefore it cannot be a software bug, because there is no specification. It's only specified t
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00619.html (9,617 bytes)

44. Re: [TenTec] Another O1 Bug 2.056 T/R Delay freezeup (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 04:53:06 -0400
Was he able to explain how is the TX mode actually established? The manual does not even attempt to define that. No, it cannot be an operator error because the correct procedure hasn't been defined.
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00680.html (7,649 bytes)

45. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2.055 Observations (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 01:54:12 -0500
This is normal. There is a theoretical minimum filter length for a given bandwidth. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00177.html (8,373 bytes)

46. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2.055 Observations (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 01:56:06 -0500
Correct. Sounds like a problem, indeed. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00246.html (8,804 bytes)

47. [TenTec] Orion I V2.055 Spurious Response (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 19:38:06 -0500
Orion I with V2.055 set up as follows: MAIN RX on ANT1 and VFO A, 3750 kHz LSB, 6 kHz roofing filter, BW = 2500 Hz, PBT = 0 Hz, 199 taps RF GAIN = 100, PREAMP ON, no ATTN A -79 dBm (S8 dB) carrier at
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00441.html (8,279 bytes)

48. Re: [TenTec] Orion I V2.055 Spurious Response (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 20:59:52 -0500
Did you provide a 3750 kHz carrier to ANT connector? 73, Sinisa
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00443.html (8,019 bytes)

49. Re: [TenTec] Orion I V2.055 Spurious Response (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 17:07:48 -0500
Just loaded 1.373b5 and it appears the same as 2.055. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00468.html (7,766 bytes)

50. Re: [TenTec] Orion I V2.055 Spurious Response (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 05:20:16 -0500
By "S9" do you mean -73 dBm level or just "9" on the S meter? My test was done with a known level in dBm, preamp on, attenuator off. As my Orion was still open, I made a quick test by feeding 14 kHz
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00524.html (9,097 bytes)

51. [TenTec] 100 Hz DSP CW filter response with Orion I V2.056 (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 05:49:13 -0500
The following 100 Hz DSP CW filter response was measured with a calibrated signal fed directly to ADC input on A7 board. 156 Hz width at -6 dB 378 Hz width at -40 dB (sidelobe peak) 512 Hz width at -
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00525.html (9,194 bytes)

52. Re: [TenTec] 100 Hz DSP CW filter response with Orion I V2.056 (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 11:10:21 -0500
That's essentially the audio filter's response, given that IF filter is much wider. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00537.html (8,516 bytes)

53. Re: [TenTec] 100 Hz DSP CW filter response with Orion I V2.056 (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 12:42:24 -0500
Exactly. It is easy to verify that with V2 a strong carrier off-tuned to just become inadible is still causing S meter deflection and AGC action (with threshold set appropriately). 73, Sinisa YT1NT,
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00542.html (8,830 bytes)

54. Re: [TenTec] Great Contest Radio? (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 13:49:19 -0500
Our hobby, like other hobbies, is a social phenomenon, any technical contents there is just an excuse. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00610.html (8,222 bytes)

55. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Sweep and Tuning Rates - a small experiment (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 04:49:32 -0500
FAST rate is only 250 steps per rotation, and SLOW amount to mere 62.5 steps per rotation, making it feel too much "digital" if STEP is 100 Hz, and too slow with 625 Hz per rotation, if STEP is 10 Hz
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00629.html (8,032 bytes)

56. Re: [TenTec] Effect of roofing filter selection on Orion II NB (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 05:19:48 -0500
Was the step 4 measured with no signal audible, just the noise? 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00668.html (9,740 bytes)

57. Re: [TenTec] Effect of roofing filter selection on Orion II NB (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 05:27:07 -0500
73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00669.html (9,705 bytes)

58. Re: [TenTec] Roof filters (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 07:50:42 -0500
.. Roofing filter has one BW in CW, another in SSB? 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00672.html (7,038 bytes)

59. Re: [TenTec] Orion Sub Receiver BW (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 12:48:40 -0500
I attempted to measure AM RX audio response with 2.056 a few times, and in all ocassions it was 3 kHz on both main and sub RX. RX filters were fully open and RX was fed from a signal generator having
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00783.html (8,441 bytes)

60. Re: [TenTec] Orion Sub Receiver BW (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 13:07:08 -0500
With V1 firmware the indicated AM bandwidth was that of the recovered audio. With V2 it is the actual IF bandwidth, limited to 6 kHz and preventing any response above 3 kHz, unlike V1. 73, Sinisa YT
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00788.html (9,083 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu