Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:shristov@ptt.yu: 307 ]

Total 307 documents matching your query.

221. Re: [TenTec] Capture area (was 80 meter loops) (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 16:08:03 -0500
It is necessary and sufficient to compare these and other antennas by comparing their [more or less] realistically computed radiation patterns, as related to the job at hand. It's a budgeting problem
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00612.html (10,694 bytes)

222. Re: [TenTec] Capture area (was 80 meter loops) (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 07:41:17 -0500
I'd rather use a feedline: coax and a small ferrite choke at feedpoint. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VA3TTN
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00622.html (9,119 bytes)

223. Re: [TenTec] Capture area (was 80 meter loops) (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 07:46:10 -0500
Yes - the context was that of increasing wire length for a fixed wavelength - in which case talking about aperture does not provide anything that's not already provided by the radiation pattern. I al
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00623.html (10,364 bytes)

224. Re: [TenTec] Re: End Fed Antennas [Was: Capture area] (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 13:37:51 -0500
= good RF fed into soil :-) The loss is normally ~0.05 dB (read: immeasurable :-) Precondition for this is a resonant antenna, ensuring low voltage at the feedpoint. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VA3TTN
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00638.html (9,629 bytes)

225. Re: [TenTec] Capture area (was 80 meter loops) (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 13:40:26 -0500
With such a location one can afford loss of several dB's :-) 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VA3TTN
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00639.html (8,734 bytes)

226. Re: [TenTec] Re: End Fed Antennas [Was: Capture area] (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 15:16:43 -0500
Impedance must be low enough and resistive enough. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VA3TTN
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00644.html (9,004 bytes)

227. Re: [TenTec] Re: Toasting those cores.... (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 09:31:44 -0500
"K" is an excellent choice, stick to it. That makes a transmission line with a characteristic impedance substantially higher than 50 Ohms. You may wish to use a regular 50 Ohms coax, with Teflon insu
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00877.html (8,207 bytes)

228. Re: [TenTec] ORION Synthesizer problem at 18 MHz (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:23:42 -0500
Held the USER 2 button on power up? 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VA3TTN
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00889.html (7,605 bytes)

229. Re: [TenTec] Topband: BDR redux (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 16:39:58 -0500
We've been enjoying "AGC Treshold" for many decades, although we didn't use the name until the recent marketing breakthroughs :-) AGC threshold determines the point above which AGC loop is operationa
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00084.html (8,933 bytes)

230. Re: [TenTec] ORION RIT "Step" (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 18:34:54 -0500
Unfortunately, they seem to be coupled. And encoder resolution on Orion is rather poor: * VFO encoder ~64/256 steps per revolution, compared to ~250/1000 on F1000MP * RIT encoder ~10/40 steps per re
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00091.html (9,653 bytes)

231. Re: [Orion] Re: [TenTec] Topband: BDR redux (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 18:41:06 -0500
This is true. It's certainly better to have a separate AGC threshold, as in Orion. Unfortunately, AGC Threshold control on Orion is an ergonomic disaster. It should have had a knob assigned to itself
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00093.html (8,818 bytes)

232. Re: [TenTec] Topband: BDR redux (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 18:49:20 -0500
If AGC Threshold control was reasonably accessible, I bet you'd be using it all the time. I find very useful for optimizing reception of individual signals. Unfortunately, it's impossible to use it q
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00094.html (9,475 bytes)

233. Re: [Orion] Re: [TenTec] Topband: BDR redux (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 19:26:57 -0500
That's exactly too much for me :-) I'm not sure either, just a though that it's position should be indicated in relation to signal levels presented on the S meter. Those 5-digit microvolts (with ~1 d
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00097.html (9,068 bytes)

234. Re: [TenTec] Topband: BDR redux (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 19:29:21 -0500
You just sold me the software :-) Wishing it was in S units! 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VA3TTN
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00098.html (9,439 bytes)

235. [TenTec] Orion redefines the meaning of ... AGC OFF (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2004 02:20:45 -0500
Can anybody explain what twist of mind one should perform in order to perceive the meaning of "AGC OFF" on Orion? Looks like it means "ON without limits". 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VA3TTN
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00135.html (9,036 bytes)

236. Re: [TenTec] Orion redefines the meaning of ... AGC OFF (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2004 17:17:49 -0500
Sounds like a theory. Have you really tried turning it off? What I see is the strongest possible AGC action with the threshold at/below noise level and 1000 dB/s. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VA3TTN
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00163.html (7,843 bytes)

237. Re: [TenTec] Orion redefines the meaning of ... AGC OFF (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2004 17:46:56 -0500
This good article doesn't help, neither analog nor digital AGC cannot be turned off at all. AGC OFF forces the following parameter values: hang = 0 decay = 1000 dB/s threshold = 0.37 uV Far from bei
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00166.html (8,327 bytes)

238. Re: More Re: [TenTec] Orion redefines the meaning of ... AGC OFF (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 10:07:19 -0500
Increase in audio volume demonstrates only that the preamp has some gain, with AGC threshold not reached without preamp. Nothing more and nothing less than that. Taken alone, this says nothing about
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00203.html (11,710 bytes)

239. Re: More Re: [TenTec] Orion redefines the meaning of ... AGC OFF (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 14:33:55 -0500
Thanks, this clearly illustrates that K2's noise figure (preamp off) is too high for 28 MHz operation, at least for your location and antennas. How about Orion with preamp off? 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VA3T
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00215.html (10,592 bytes)

240. Re: [TenTec] Orion AVC (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 15:04:13 -0500
First thing one should do is to adjust receiver sensitivity according to local conditions on the band in question. This procedure applies to any receiver, not just Orion's. Connecting and disconnecti
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00217.html (8,725 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu