Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:shristov@ptt.yu: 307 ]

Total 307 documents matching your query.

161. Re: [TenTec] Basic question (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 06:10:42 -0400
You could have reduced RF gain "until the background noise decreased significantly". 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VA3TTN
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00053.html (9,104 bytes)

162. Re: [TenTec] Basic question (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 10:56:09 -0400
S meter stays just above noise level, so it remains usable for most signals. If the external noise activates AGC, then it is the external noise actually determining usable sensitivity, not RX gain or
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00064.html (9,109 bytes)

163. Re: [TenTec] Basic question (especially NR operation) (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 15:19:09 -0400
If this applies to Orion - I'd do the same. Suggestion of reducing RF GAIN applies to TS850, MP and similar rigs. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VA3TTN
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00124.html (9,001 bytes)

164. Re: [TenTec] Basic question (especially NR operation) (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 04:23:37 -0400
No, I've never recommended such a thing, you misread it. In my text 12 dB refers to the difference between external noise level and RX internal noise level. The adjustment is performed by using contr
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00151.html (9,089 bytes)

165. Re: [TenTec] Orion Roofing Filter Cut In (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 03:53:02 -0400
Not true. It is easy to verify that PBT functions correctly with both filters at 2400 Hz, or any other value. No, Orion normally uses only the central part of roofing filter's BW in order to prevent
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00262.html (10,359 bytes)

166. Re: [TenTec] Orion Roofing Filter Cut In (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 04:55:46 -0400
I'd say it is quite good. Only the flat [central] part of roofing filter's passband passes through the DSP filter and DSP filter's passband flatness is mostly preserved. Also, group delay variation o
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00266.html (10,124 bytes)

167. Re: [TenTec] When is a filter roofing? (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 05:17:30 -0400
When it's good enough to serve as a "real" filter :-) 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VA3TTN
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00268.html (7,251 bytes)

168. Re: [TenTec] G3SJX IC-7800 review (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 16:04:52 -0400
Systematically or at random, like Orion? 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VA3TTN
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00370.html (7,995 bytes)

169. Re: [TenTec] ORION QRQ Performance (long) (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 04:26:55 -0400
... Hi Bob, several months (and revisions) earlier, I performed detailed measurements and found that quality of transmitted CW greatly varied with code speed, time between characters/words and especi
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00866.html (8,973 bytes)

170. Re: [TenTec] ORION QRQ tests (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:31:15 -0400
Unfortunately, Orion's TX seems to operate "full QSK" all the time. There is a CW PTT input now, but TT choose not to use it to prepare TX for transmission. PTT is only used for external amp control.
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00880.html (8,657 bytes)

171. Re: [TenTec] ORION QRQ tests (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 17:54:29 -0400
Are you sure that it actually holds TX active, as opposed to just delaying receive audio? 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VA3TTN
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00887.html (8,589 bytes)

172. Re: [TenTec] Why is the Jupiter better? (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:50:17 -0400
At at price of only ~10% of TX power being actually radiated. Which may or may not be objectionable. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VA3TTN
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00147.html (8,584 bytes)

173. Re: [TenTec] Queston for Orion Owners? (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 17:38:38 -0400
It worked incorrectly from the beginning, i.e. BW was transferred, but PBT wasn't, making even the former useless. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VA3TTN
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00163.html (8,849 bytes)

174. Re: [TenTec] An example of changing Orion firmware to meet expectationsof the operator. (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 10:42:02 -0400
Please, please, please, just be consistent! Whenever you save/restore BW, please do so with PBT too. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VA3TTN
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00207.html (9,590 bytes)

175. Re: [TenTec] DSP dynamic range (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:55:47 -0400
Orion's ADC chip has S/(N+D) specification of 84 dB minimum, 90 dB "typical". This specification applies to manufacturer's test circuit only, and one has to consider Orion's actual circuit. Looks li
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00594.html (7,751 bytes)

176. Re: [TenTec] Question for Contesters: (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 13:22:26 -0400
Looks like SDR has more marketing than contesting advantages :-) Also enables manufacturers to save a couple of bucks, while simultaneously claiming technological advance. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VA3TTN
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00154.html (8,205 bytes)

177. Re: [TenTec] Question for Contesters: (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 13:53:01 -0400
And, above all, enables manufacturers to release unfinished products, promising to fix design errors sometimes in the future. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VA3TTN
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00158.html (8,337 bytes)

178. Re: AW: [TenTec] Question for Contesters: (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 07:02:21 -0400
Reality is that FT-1000x was released with a number of problems two orders of magnitude smaller than Orion's. I'd put aside the possibility of adding any new features to Orion at least until it begin
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00184.html (8,978 bytes)

179. Re: AW: [TenTec] Question for Contesters: (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 11:07:28 -0400
That's true, but that's a single problem, and I was referring to the number of problems known to exist. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VA3TTN
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00193.html (7,626 bytes)

180. Re: [TenTec] Question for Contesters: (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 11:18:31 -0400
Well, I have one with most of the options. It did cost me ~$6600 to arrive here. Describing its operation with the supplied firmware as "unfinished" is actually a very mild way of putting it. 73, Sin
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00194.html (7,783 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu