Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:shristov@ptt.rs: 48 ]

Total 48 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] Orion 565 tuning encoder (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 04:10:15 +0200
Such a drop is certainly excessive. By providing +5.0 V from an external suuply directly to the encoder you can distinguish between a bad encoder and a bad supply, and then make the repair as needed.
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-06/msg00187.html (8,938 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] Antenna measurements (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 00:27:38 +0200
This is incorrect and misleading. Whenever an AC current flows on a wire, there is an accompanying and inseparable AC electromagnetic field surrounding the wire. And the said AC field propagates in a
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00198.html (10,759 bytes)

23. Re: [TenTec] Built in SWR meter bannans (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:10:02 +0200
In theory, yes, provided that the choke impedance is much higher than antenna impedance. In practice, this means choke impedance >=10 kOhm, which can be achieved only with special attention, and the
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00224.html (10,000 bytes)

24. Re: [TenTec] Let's try the message again (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 23:19:29 +0200
Could you, please, pinpoint the place in the book? No, that's wrong. But let's first see what is Kraus actually saying. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00239.html (7,394 bytes)

25. Re: [TenTec] Built in SWR meter bannans (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:22:16 +0200
Heat is produced in both the wire and the core. A lossy core wound with a small number of turns, and subjected to substantial common mode VOLTAGE will overheat. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00282.html (10,044 bytes)

26. Re: [TenTec] Built in SWR meter bannans (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:29:15 +0200
... Steve's analysis is correct. The same analysis repeated for a high impedance antenna will quickly reveal difficulties of using a ferrite chokes with antenna impedances in the hundreds of Ohms ran
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00284.html (9,989 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] Built in SWR meter bannans (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:42:58 +0200
All cores are lossy, and their loss manifests itself by heat generation within the core whenever there is an RF field inside the core. This has nothing to do with wires. running 1.5kW through a chok
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00299.html (11,005 bytes)

28. Re: [TenTec] Built in SWR meter bannans (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 21:35:11 +0200
Jerry's treatment of choke baluns has a serious shortcoming: he tested his choke baluns in transmission mode only (i.e. as transmission lines), entirely neglecting the critical aspect of common mode
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00302.html (10,109 bytes)

29. [TenTec] Balancing Orion 565 VFO knobs (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:27:35 +0200
Has anyone suceeded in balancing Orion 565 VFO knobs? On my Orion 565, both VFO knobs (when left to themselves) return to the same angular position, which is precisely the same on both encoder shafts
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00300.html (8,742 bytes)

30. Re: [TenTec] Balancing Orion 565 VFO knobs (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 19:44:55 +0200
It's great to know that knobs on 566 do not drift by themselves. I managed today to balance both of my 565 VFO knobs. It was easier than expected, took me 15 minutes per knob. Using an 8 mm slot dril
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00313.html (9,789 bytes)

31. Re: [TenTec] TT Eagle tuner spec: SWR v. impedance range? (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 17:56:23 +0100
That would be a very good way of specification, if only it was true. "SWR <= 10" is a unambiguous reference to a set of complex impedances, i.e. those inside a certain circle on a Smith diagram. But
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00203.html (8,571 bytes)

32. Re: [TenTec] receiver specifications ---Eagle (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 21:24:15 +0100
Receiver quality is a much more complex thing than, say, IM dynamic range. IM dynamic range is a kind of limit. Under specific circumstances, if the limit is not exceeded, the IM specification is irr
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00374.html (8,133 bytes)

33. Re: [TenTec] Original Orion Firmware (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 03:10:49 +0300
I have two small items, shouldn't be difficult to fix. 1. In band stacking registers please preserve the full filter state. Currently only BW is preserved, and PBT is not. This makes it very inconven
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00223.html (8,999 bytes)

34. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII vs. K3 ? Opinions invited., (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:56:24 +0100
Hi Rick, "full power into 3:1 SWR" is just a myth. Did you ever read such a claim made by TenTec? There is nothing inside TenTec transceivers to make them to DELIVER full power into a mismatched load
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-04/msg00427.html (10,047 bytes)

35. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII vs. K3 ? Opinions invited., (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:22:46 +0100
Your thinking is correct, apart from those 40 W being actually 36 W (60 % of the forward power). The technical fact is that the only difference between a TenTec TX and, say, a Kenwood TX is lack of c
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-04/msg00436.html (10,770 bytes)

36. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 output power (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 22:48:11 +0100
Adjust the ALC SET pot (R179) on the A5 IF Board, beneath the speaker. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-02/msg00113.html (8,381 bytes)

37. Re: [TenTec] Orion Backup Battery (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 23:00:46 +0200
Board A7, schematic file 81917_13.PDF, chip U501 (M48T35AV). With DIP version of the chip, the battery is an integral part of the chip. With SOIC version of the chip, the battery can be separated and
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-08/msg00018.html (8,014 bytes)

38. Re: [TenTec] Orion Backup Battery (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 09:10:58 +0200
Look for M48T35AV chip at the left side of the logic (CPU & DSP) board. The battery (and the crystal for the unused real time clock) is within the black rectangular "SNAPHAT". 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3E
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-08/msg00024.html (7,981 bytes)

39. Re: [TenTec] Yaesu FT-1000D RF Compressor versus Ten-Tec 715 RF Clipper... not the same. (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 07:34:35 +0200
Not sure about FT1000D, but FT1000MP/MkV actually performs RF clipping, and it's very cheap, using TA7302P FM IF Amplifier. Users of "external RF Clippers" must be aware of the fact that the processe
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00320.html (8,912 bytes)

40. Re: [TenTec] RF Ground (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 05:29:44 +0200
An arbitrary point can be taken as a potential reference. The choice itself has no physical consequences. It's just a notational convenience. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00073.html (8,686 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu