Mail Archive Search: <+from:seay@ALASKA.NET>

Results:

References: [ +from:seay@ALASKA.NET: 117 ]

Total 117 documents matching your query.

61. [TenTec] Why Stop Here ? MFJ Cleartone replacement (score: 1): Author: seay@Alaska.NET (Del Seay); Date: Fri, 13 Feb 1998 06:21:29 -0900; -- To: <tentec@contesting.com> contesting.com/km9p/search.htm A few years ago, I picked up from Fair Radio Sales, a couple sets of headphones from the Korean War era, complete with real. honest to Go; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-02/msg00119.html (8,951 bytes)
62. [TenTec] Why Stop Here ? (score: 1): Author: seay@Alaska.NET (Del Seay); Date: Fri, 13 Feb 1998 12:34:11 -0900; No rock throwing here, Brian, just an observation. Audio quality on "phone" is not necessarily a good thing. If that were the criteria, we would all be using phasing type systems instead of filter sy; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-02/msg00127.html (10,125 bytes)
63. [TenTec] OMNI-6 Plus (score: 1): Author: seay@Alaska.NET (Del & Jan Seay); Date: Fri, 20 Feb 1998 13:50:09 -0900; One feature that has been added - and NOT DOCUMENTED, is a serial port test routine. To use , fire up a standard communications emulator program such as Procomm, etc. Set up for 1200/N/8/1 and the se; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-02/msg00228.html (7,073 bytes)
64. [TenTec] Operating Software (score: 1): Author: seay@Alaska.NET (Del Seay); Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1998 11:12:19 -0900; Hi Mitch: I've been waiting for one of the software guru's to write a good operating program for the Omnis. So far, only logging software available that has limited control of the radio. My need/want; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-02/msg00263.html (8,334 bytes)
65. [TenTec] Omni 6 radio control with LogPlus help please!! (score: 1): Author: seay@Alaska.NET (Del & Jan Seay); Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1998 19:57:05 -0900; John: In the Omni menu, select Menu 2, and turn on the "CdE". This causes the Omni to report to the serial port what happens on the panel. That should take care of it. Good Luck, de KL7HF -- To: <ten; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-02/msg00285.html (8,585 bytes)
66. [TenTec] narrow filters (score: 1): Author: seay@Alaska.NET (Jan & Del Seay); Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 21:56:43 -0000; Hi Bill. There are definite advantages, but no so much in using really narrow filters. Of course, the more tandom filters you have, the steeper the walls, assuming they are well matched to each other; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-02/msg00301.html (9,474 bytes)
67. [TenTec] OMNI VI USB/LSB BFO's (score: 1): Author: seay@ALASKA.NET (Del Seay); Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 06:26:06 -0900; Unfortunately, this is a problem with crystal filters. The filter slopes are never that equal. That's the reason Collins developed the mechanical filter. It has equal slopes on both sides of the pass; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-01/msg00181.html (9,692 bytes)
68. [TenTec] Another T-Kit receiver finished (score: 1): Author: seay@alaska.net (Del Seay); Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 06:47:45 -0900; Just put the last bolt & nut in my T-Kit receiver, cute little piece of gear and sounds great! Now - I have an appointment with an ophthalmologist on Friday! de KL7HF -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contes; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-01/msg00246.html (6,884 bytes)
69. [TenTec] TT Service (score: 1): Author: seay@alaska.net (Del Seay); Date: Wed, 10 Dec 1997 07:38:13 -0900; Hi Mark. I've not been a TenTec owner all that long, about 5 years, but - I have had a couple of problems, all of which a quick call to Sevierville had the parts in my hands in a couple of days. I'm; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-12/msg00111.html (9,159 bytes)
70. [TenTec] #253 Tuner (score: 1): Author: seay@alaska.net (Jan & Del Seay); Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 15:12:03 -0000; I've probably opened and worked on literally thousands of radios in my 45 years of radio work, from both smoking and non-smoking environments. Residue that is airborne from tobacco use probably has l; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-12/msg00183.html (10,257 bytes)
71. [TenTec] Custom Filters? (score: 1): Author: seay@ALASKA.NET (Jan & Del Seay); Date: Fri, 26 Dec 1997 17:05:38 -0000; Looking at the filters that Ten-Tec uses, it would not be a great big job to re-crystal for whatever bandwidth wanted. It may take a little try and retry before hitting the proper rocks, but that's w; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-12/msg00246.html (7,687 bytes)
72. [TenTec] Estimating receiver pass (score: 1): Author: seay@Alaska.NET (Jan & Del Seay); Date: Thu, 09 Oct 1997 23:11:06 -0700; If you want an "End-to-End" test, the proper way is with a white noise generator fed directly into the microphone input,and the antenna jack. Then - all is equal. Anything less is really meaningless.; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-10/msg00058.html (7,869 bytes)
73. [TenTec] Info on Omni V (score: 1): Author: seay@Alaska.NET (Del Seay); Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 14:28:56 -0900; I have had the OMNI-V and now the Six, and the RIT control on the Six is no great advantage. It's actually easier to use the least important thing to consider. de KL7HF -- To: <tentec@contesting.com>; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-10/msg00235.html (8,855 bytes)
74. [TenTec] Info on Omni V (score: 1): Author: seay@Alaska.NET (Del Seay); Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 10:17:18 -0900; Absolutely no problem using split vfo during qsk. I've used the TS-940 qsk and there is no comparison. The 940 doesn't get out of the gate! de KL7HF -- To: <tentec@contesting.com> -- FAQ on WWW: http; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-10/msg00244.html (8,735 bytes)
75. [TenTec] OPINIONS?? (score: 1): Author: seay@Alaska.NET (Del Seay); Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 06:25:26 -0700; Hello Ted. You're on the wrong reflector to get an objective opinion. The gang here are Ten-Tec nuts! I'll try to be objective, and I have had both on the bench for tests. I have not used the 1000MP; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-09/msg00047.html (8,125 bytes)
76. [TenTec] Transmatches/Tuners/Etc. (score: 1): Author: seay@Alaska.NET (Del Seay); Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 06:19:13 -0700; These don't handle hi-power well. I bought two to use with my low band folded dipoles and had to climb the tower right in the middle of a pileup on VK0IR. Lost the other one within a few weeks. I try; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-09/msg00146.html (9,224 bytes)
77. [TenTec] "Tuning" antennas; baluns (score: 1): Author: seay@Alaska.NET (Del Seay, KL7HF); Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 07:56:32 -0800 (AKDT); I think what we have here is a misunderstanding of each others terminology. There are several absolutes involved. 1: An antenna is resonant when standing waves exist along it's length. No amount of t; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-09/msg00151.html (12,523 bytes)
78. [TenTec] DeJaVu (score: 1): Author: seay@Alaska.NET (Jan & Del Seay); Date: Sat, 16 Aug 1997 11:00:12 -0800 (AKDT); I think I've just entered the Twilight Zone. I'm reading messages from last week that have already passed! My watch says it's saturday, so at least part of me continued into the weekend. But the tv i; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-08/msg00149.html (6,661 bytes)
79. [TenTec] Omni-6 Plus Upgrade (score: 1): Author: seay@Alaska.NET (Del Seay); Date: Thu, 28 Aug 1997 06:20:22 -0700; I'd like to pass along my observations on the Plus upgrade for those who are contemplating. First, I made a mistake ordering the 1.8 kHz 2nd filter for ssb. I don't use ssb that much, and the filter; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-08/msg00204.html (8,632 bytes)
80. [TenTec] OMNI-6 Plus upgrade (score: 1): Author: seay@Alaska.NET (Del Seay); Date: Thu, 28 Aug 1997 07:20:19 -0700; Due to the number of comments, I feel that I may have a problem with my Omni. It appears that everyone else is staill able to change the cw offset. So - back to the drawing board. Thanks, guys. de KL; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-08/msg00206.html (7,138 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]