Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:rwd@iteris.com: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Technical Correspondence (score: 1)
Author: Rick Denney <rwd@iteris.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 01:32:36 -0400
The arguments for and against open software sourcing have raged for years, and are not likely to be resolved here, it seems to me. Suffice to say that eloquent arguments can be made for both sides an
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00378.html (10,030 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Audio quality issue in Heil headset with Omni V (score: 1)
Author: Rick Denney <rwd@iteris.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:20:18 -0400
Barry N1EU writes... Thanks for the replies so far. The questions led me to observe more carefully. The problem only occurs on the monitor, not on signals being received over the air. That opens the
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00331.html (8,946 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI and non TT Amp (score: 1)
Author: Rick Denney <rwd@iteris.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 00:06:32 -0500
Ken Brown writes... I was talking about the Ameritron AL-811a amplifier, which uses three 811a transmitting tubes, not the tube itself. The 572b tubes are indeed capable of greater output because of
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00173.html (9,115 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II PTO Problems (score: 1)
Author: Rick Denney <rwd@iteris.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:17:49 -0500
hamradio@twcny.rr.com writes... The Omni V, unless you want a general coverage receiver for short wave listening. From all reports, the Paragon II was better than the Paragon (and the Paragon isn't b
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00618.html (9,723 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu