Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ronc@sonic.net: 729 ]

Total 729 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [TenTec] Reply All gotcha (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 20:02:24 -0800
Because the list server is the sender, and you are replying to it or should be. If the server does a "redirect to list" instead of a "forward to list", the reply will go to the sender instead of the
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00419.html (8,547 bytes)

82. Re: [TenTec] New Orion Firmware (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:24:57 -0800
I haven't tested 2.032 much, but it appears that the mysterious QSK problem has been fixed. Now, that's after all of about two minutes of testing it, and things may change, but for now, it looks like
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00506.html (8,982 bytes)

83. [TenTec] O2 v 2.032 QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 18:09:15 -0800
I sent two reply messages, but they didn't get through to the list. I have tested the 2.032 version of the Orion II software and found that the QSK bug I reported last week in 2.031 has been fixed. T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00565.html (7,005 bytes)

84. Re: [TenTec] Sweep on O2 (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 09:41:49 -0800
Ron Castro Chief Technical Officer Results Radio, LLC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00602.html (9,050 bytes)

85. Re: [TenTec] orion with 2.055 firmware -- headphones? (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 19:31:47 -0800
Ron Castro Chief Technical Officer Results Radio, LLC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00711.html (11,633 bytes)

86. Re: [TenTec] orion with 2.055 firmware -- headphones? (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 19:43:31 -0800
The audio output chip in the Orion is the TDA1013B by Phillips, which is adequate for the job although not THX Hi-Fi by any means! You can see all the specs and performance data at: http://www.semico
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00712.html (12,407 bytes)

87. Re: [TenTec] orion with 2.055 firmware -- headphones? (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 21:16:44 -0800
I looked up that Sweet Sounds speaker on the Internet, and it looks like a pretty good accessory. Pretty good efficiency, optimized response shaping to eliminate high-end hiss and extraneous junk as
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00715.html (10,017 bytes)

88. [TenTec] Speaking of Headphones (Orion) (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 14:12:12 -0800
I noticed that when I unplugged the headphones from my O2 that the speaker volume was quite loud and had to be turned down. After doing some research, I learned that the Orion's headphone output is m
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00752.html (7,990 bytes)

89. [TenTec] Speaking of Headphones (Orion) (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 17:25:30 -0800
No... the output to the headphones is from an LM386 chip. Here are the specs: http://downloads.solarbotics.com/PDF/LM386.pdf Look down about half way for the Device Dissipation vs. Output curves. TT
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00763.html (8,571 bytes)

90. Re: [TenTec] Speaking of Headphones (Orion) (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 21:45:59 -0800
I don't think higher impedance phones will damage the unit, they just won't sound as loud and may tend to sound distorted. I think I am going to go the transformer route since I like my Heil Pro Set,
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00768.html (9,260 bytes)

91. Re: [TenTec] Speaking of Headphones (Orion) (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 08:48:51 -0800
Having been a broadcast Air Personality for 37 of the past 40 years, which means I used headphones professionally every day, I can tell you without reservation that the Sony 7506's are the best I hav
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00779.html (11,085 bytes)

92. [TenTec] Speaking of Headphones (Orion) (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 09:53:45 -0800
Having been a broadcast Air Personality for 37 of the past 40 years, which means I used headphones professionally every day, I can tell you without reservation that the Sony 7506's are the best I hav
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00782.html (10,804 bytes)

93. Re: [TenTec] Orion Sub Receiver BW (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 10:05:06 -0800
My understanding is that in AM, the BW shown is supposed to be the actual recovered audio bandwidth, not the total bandwidth. There is no reason why it should be restricted to any less than 12 kHz si
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00785.html (10,176 bytes)

94. Re: [TenTec] Orion Sub Receiver BW (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 15:58:57 -0800
Well, the transmitted audio on an NRSC-1 compliant AM transmitter is up to 10 kHz, which gives rise to a channel 20 kHz wide in total bandwidth. An NRSC-3 (1990) complaint receiver (I think there was
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00816.html (13,914 bytes)

95. Re: [TenTec] Further Orion Sub Receiver -- Some results (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 15:08:04 -0800
Grant: What do you see at 100% modulation? I have noticed a fair bit of distortion on AM on the O2, even on ground-wave commercial broadcast signals, and have reported this to TT. I don't hear it at
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00863.html (9,838 bytes)

96. Re: [TenTec] Further Orion Sub Receiver -- Some results (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:05:37 -0800
That would also depend on what you were measuring that was down 33 dB. If you are measuring distortion as a percentage of power on a scale calibrated in dBm (typical of an RF spectrum analyzer) the f
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00868.html (10,293 bytes)

97. Re: [TenTec] Further Orion Sub Receiver -- Some results (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:46:44 -0800
You have a good sense of humor, Grant, and around here you need it!!! Happy St. Patty's Day....I'm off for some Irish Whiskey in a wee bit...I wish I could work that TY5 3.506.06 before I go, but 'ti
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00870.html (9,765 bytes)

98. Re: [TenTec] Orion AM RX Performance Measurements (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 09:09:04 -0800
Sinisa: Great information! Was this on an O1 or O2? In AM, even with the AGC settings you describe for low distortion, I still hear significant distortion on the voice peaks on stable, ground-wave co
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00886.html (13,990 bytes)

99. [TenTec] Orion AM--interesting experiment (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 22:38:59 -0800
While reading over some posts, I got a wild idea that I just tried for AM listening on the ham bands. Try this setup: Audio: Left on Main, Right on Sub Main and Sub on AM Main and Sub BW: 6000 Main P
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00933.html (7,319 bytes)

100. Re: [TenTec] RF Getting back into Rig Problem (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 09:59:32 -0800
One thing I would add: I found RF getting into me O2 primarily through the headphone connector and the CW paddles connector on the back panel. Ferrites on each fixed the problem I had no problem with
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00949.html (11,541 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu