Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ronc@sonic.net: 729 ]

Total 729 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [TenTec] V 1.372 for Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 17:19:20 -0700
Where would you suggest to look? Ron N6AHA _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00402.html (9,833 bytes)

142. Re: [TenTec] Orion Main and Sub frequency difference (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 17:58:05 -0700
Do you also have a calibration offset for the main oscillator? Ron N6AHA _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00405.html (8,733 bytes)

143. Re: [TenTec] Reflector is getting effective at killing sales (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 08:37:12 -0700
The purpose of the reflector is not to be a "rah-rah" crowd for Ten Tec. We have brought up legitimate problems and constructive criticisms. You may disagree, and that is your right, but at the end o
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00446.html (9,783 bytes)

144. Re: [TenTec] Reflector is getting effective at killing sales (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 09:31:09 -0700
I agree. A little PR goes a long way, and it's so easy to do in the Internet age. I don't think anything on this reflector is killing sales judging from the fact that if you order an O2 without the t
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00546.html (10,247 bytes)

145. Re: [TenTec] Reflector is getting effective at killing sales (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 09:49:24 -0700
The department that follows up on "picky comments" is different than the production department. Ron N6AHA _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com htt
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00547.html (12,187 bytes)

146. [TenTec] Orion II Freqency response graph (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:43:15 -0700
Dear folks: I have posted a new graph on my webpage showing the TX frequency response of the Orion II v. 2.032, which now includes the AM response. It looks a lot prettier since I used Excel's powerf
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00556.html (6,975 bytes)

147. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Freqency response graph (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:03:15 -0700
The standard methodology is to use a fixed output, in this case 20 Watts at 1 kHz, then adjust the attenuator on the signal generator to maintain the 20 Watt output. For AM, I used a Spectrum Analyze
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00561.html (10,272 bytes)

148. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Freqency response graph (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 22:59:11 -0700
The 870 has excellent audio, but the receiver is mediocre. Pre-equalizing a even several dB won't introduce distortion due to the input and AGC characteristics of the SSM2166 mic preamp IC. But the b
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00679.html (11,121 bytes)

149. Re: [TenTec] Orion Band Decoder Output Bug (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 23:07:26 -0700
I have also noticed similar types of bugs in the O2, including one I occasionally see where two antennas get selected at once. Changing bands fixes the problem, and I haven't considered it serious si
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00680.html (9,278 bytes)

150. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft KW Solid State Amps (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 20:21:53 -0700
I saw the earlier post about the amp, but have they released any specs yet other than the power and frequency coverage? Ron N6AHA _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00749.html (9,523 bytes)

151. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] [orion565] new firmware (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 09:22:29 -0700
That's good to know...I'll add that to my list of "Things to Fix" on my website. Ron Castro Chief Technical Officer Results Radio, LLC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing l
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00763.html (8,000 bytes)

152. Re: [TenTec] Ver 2.033 (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:14:09 -0700
I ran the SSB frequency response yesterday on v. 2.033 and found it to be identical to the previous tests with the settings at BW=3900, LF Cut-off=50, EQ=0. The EQ level calibration appeared to be mo
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00786.html (8,610 bytes)

153. Re: [TenTec] question about updates (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 11:02:34 -0700
I'm always happy to share my thoughts :-) The O2's low-end drop off (-12 dB @ 100 Hz and -15 dB @ 50 Hz) can be mitigated by using an external EQ, such as the W2IHY 8-Band, which is what I use. The a
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00804.html (15,811 bytes)

154. Re: [TenTec] Ver 2.033 (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 00:16:15 -0700
I noticed low power when I first tried AM in the new version, but after a few minutes it popped back up. Another odd thing is that it operates different on 10 meters than on 75. I checked it briefly
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00815.html (9,065 bytes)

155. Re: [TenTec] Happy Orion owners (was question about updates) (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 14:28:31 -0700
I'll bet you would be happier if your S-meter wasn't off by 12 to 22 dB, the Notch and Auto Notch worked the way the TT webpage says it should, the monitor worked on AM, the NR worked the way it did
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00861.html (9,587 bytes)

156. Re: [TenTec] Happy Orion owners (was question about updates) (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 15:36:48 -0700
The issue of not being able to adjust the AM power is a problem since most modern amps run 1500 Watts out for 55 Watts in. Since AM PEP = 4 x carrier power, 13 Watts carrier is the most drive you sho
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00868.html (11,822 bytes)

157. Re: [TenTec] Is the Orion an AM radio or a DXer's radio?? (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 21:06:39 -0700
The website and advertising brochure don't say anything about being a "DX'ers radio". Here's what they do say: "The Ten-Tec Orion II represents an entirely new concept in high-performance HF transcei
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00000.html (10,107 bytes)

158. Re: [TenTec] Orion as AM radio (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 08:31:17 -0700
You're right...plate modulation in broadcasting died many years ago in favor of PDM and some esoteric new digital methods that work by actually constructing the final RF wave form by turning on an ap
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00023.html (10,282 bytes)

159. Re: [TenTec] FM TX on Orion II (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 17:28:45 -0700
O2 FM NFG... Ron N6AHA _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00045.html (9,176 bytes)

160. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 - Anyone else notice this? (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 19:52:39 -0700
Not heard on my unit, but you should check to see if it's power supply related, or possibly being generated from some other equipment, such as computers that can be getting into the rig via the power
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00052.html (8,341 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu