Mail Archive Search: <+from:rick@rickdenney.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:rick@rickdenney.com: 108 ]

Total 108 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TenTec] New generation ham's (score: 1): Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:50:46 -0400; Marinus Loewensteijn writes... I'm not sure I can relate your questions in this paragraph to the general statement (that I snipped) that young people generally seek the easy way. I know many old hams; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00518.html (9,643 bytes)
62. Re: [TenTec] New generation ham's-offtopic but had to say something (score: 1): Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 23:06:45 -0400; Jim Brown K9YC writes... An extremely important point to remember is that there is no exclusivity between "contributing" and "having fun". These two characteristics should both be true. And it is imp; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00574.html (10,604 bytes)
63. Re: [TenTec] New generation ham's-offtopic but had to say something (score: 1): Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>; Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 14:36:58 -0400; Bob Close writes... Bob, I don't really know how to respond to your post. The dripping irony seems to suggest that you were under attack, and since you sent this message both to the list and directly; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00015.html (8,922 bytes)
64. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII (score: 1): Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>; Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 10:29:43 -0400; Wayne Whitman writes... It doesn't have a second receiver. (Okay, I don't own a VII, but the door was open and somebody had to walk through it). By the way, here's an option for a second receiver: Ge; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00037.html (9,149 bytes)
65. Re: [TenTec] Balun Isolator (score: 1): Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>; Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 09:47:01 -0400; Jim WA9YSD writes... I've always called that a choke. Rick, KR9D _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00131.html (7,119 bytes)
66. Re: [TenTec] TVI 95% Shield (score: 1): Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>; Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 22:26:09 -0400; Ken Scheper writes... Now that you've spilled the beans and they are challenging you on it, tell them that your hobby is legally sanctioned and licensed, and it would be no different if they lived ne; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00333.html (10,775 bytes)
67. Re: [TenTec] TVI 95% Shield (score: 1): Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>; Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 23:23:48 -0400; Stuart Rohre writes... Oh, yes, that is true. I am able to receive two of four local stations reliably. But even they occasionally break up. You'll see imaging artifacts that will multiply, and the s; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00338.html (10,955 bytes)
68. Re: [TenTec] OMNI 6+ key clicks (score: 1): Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>; Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 02:35:38 -0400; Dr. Gerald N. Johnson writes... This was my thought. At Field Day last year, I was using a Kenwood TS-430 for 20-meter phone, and our 20-meter CW station was an Omni VI. I could heard their CW all up; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00393.html (7,900 bytes)
69. Re: [TenTec] Low Pass Filter (score: 1): Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>; Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 15:50:52 -0400; Bob Close writes... Seems to me a low-pass filter is not a band-pass filter, and isn't there for normal attenuation of close-in spurs. It seems to me there for attenuating VHF spurs above 30 MHz so t; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00399.html (8,967 bytes)
70. Re: [TenTec] Low Pass Filter (score: 1): Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>; Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 18:46:24 -0400; Bob Close writes... Sure. But a low-pass filter is designed to attenuate broadband noise well outside the range of desired frequencies a station might want to use. It's designed to attenuate spurious; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00403.html (11,364 bytes)
71. Re: [TenTec] Low Pass Filter (score: 1): Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 13:01:35 -0400; Dr. Gerald N. Johnson writes... Actually, folks who delve into musical acoustics use the term "overtone" and "partial" more often than "harmonic". The second harmonic, which is at the octave of the f; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00415.html (10,652 bytes)
72. Re: [TenTec] Low Pass Filter (score: 1): Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 14:18:01 -0400; Bob Close writes... A trumpet is a partial trombone. To make those three valves work, you have to push the first and third valve slides in and out to correct all the errors of having only three valve; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00423.html (10,502 bytes)
73. Re: [TenTec] Low Pass Filter (score: 1): Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 13:54:07 -0400; Dr. Gerald N. Johnson writes... I do that on my four-valve Bb tubas, but not on my five-valve F tubas. They don't have slide positions that are easily adjusted, and I can usually get close enough for; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00446.html (11,724 bytes)
74. Re: [TenTec] Early Ten-Tec's appropriate for a blind person? (score: 1): Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>; Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 15:25:49 -0400; W1GOR writes... Might be easiest in the long run to operate a newer rig using control software in an attached computer, and use the sight-impaired tools within the Windows OS to provide the annunciat; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00582.html (9,354 bytes)
75. Re: [TenTec] band conditions?? (score: 1): Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 15:33:06 -0400; Mike Bryce writes... Dunno. Last night, I participated in a club net on 75 meters and noise was low enough so that S-5 signals were solid copy. We moved to 10 meters, which was quiet as a church mous; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-06/msg00118.html (7,476 bytes)
76. Re: [TenTec] band conditions?? (score: 1): Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 10:36:01 -0400; Jim WA9YSD writes... Here's a provision of the New York State DOT specification for LED traffic signal indications: 5.4 Electronic Noise. Units supplied to this specification shall meet the requireme; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-06/msg00182.html (10,526 bytes)
77. Re: [TenTec] TT colour schemes (score: 1): Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:07:13 -0400; Steve Hunt writes... Ten Tec sells them from their web store. I bought one for my Omni V and two for my Centaur (my 229 tuner is too old and uses a different type of knob). They are soft rubber and m; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-06/msg00210.html (7,550 bytes)
78. Re: [TenTec] front panel sockets (score: 1): Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:51:50 -0400; Charles Harpole writes... Three reasons: 1. Heil headset adaptors require both a microphone and headphone connection. Having them at opposite ends of the rig would be messy. 2. Hand-held microphones; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-06/msg00266.html (8,298 bytes)
79. Re: [TenTec] Looking for a rig upgrade... (score: 1): Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 14:46:23 -0400; Paul writes... I have no trouble integrating my Omni V.9 (which has an Omni IV/Icom-style CI-V interface) with DX-Labs Commander, N4PY (of course), N1MM, etc. Where I have had trouble was in controll; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00044.html (10,443 bytes)
80. Re: [TenTec] Looking for a rig upgrade... (score: 1): Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 14:59:02 -0400; Barry N1EU writes... If he buys an Omni VI from Ten Tec's used/demo list, it will have been recently gone through and tweaked up by the factory. While that does not guarantee success, it does seem to; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00045.html (11,044 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]